These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8041927)

  • 1. [The mammographic aspect and the prognosis of breast carcinoma].
    Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Morrone D; Catarzi S
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):755-7. PubMed ID: 8041927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer: reliability of mammographic appearance as a predictor of hormone receptor status.
    Ciatto S; Morrone D; Catarzi S; Bonardi R
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):805-8. PubMed ID: 1311118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer?
    Evans AJ; Pinder SE; James JJ; Ellis IO; Cornford E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1377-80. PubMed ID: 17056932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The relationship between the receptor status and the mammographic picture in operable breast cancer].
    Ventrella V; Paradiso A; Farchi G; Tommasi S; Schittulli F; Racanelli A; De Lena M
    Radiol Med; 1990 May; 79(5):483-8. PubMed ID: 2359855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations.
    Ikeda DM; Andersson I; Wattsgård C; Janzon L; Linell F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 1632342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast carcinoma with basal phenotype: mammographic findings.
    Luck AA; Evans AJ; James JJ; Rakha EA; Paish EC; Green AR; Ellis IO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 18647900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: mammographic appearance with pathologic correlation.
    Patterson SK; Tworek JA; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Oberman HA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):709-12. PubMed ID: 9275883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relation between mammographic findings and hormonal receptor content in breast cancer.
    Nielsen NS; Poulsen HS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Sep; 145(3):501-4. PubMed ID: 2992254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography of breast carcinoma: experience of 108 cases.
    Ng SH; Ko SF; Lee CM; Pai SC; Tsai CC; Chen SC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1991 Jun; 90(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 1680998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apocrine carcinoma: clinical and mammographic features.
    Gilles R; Lesnik A; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon A; Masselot J; Contesso G; Vanel D
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):495-7. PubMed ID: 8284405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic tumour appearance and triple-negative breast cancer associated with long-term prognosis of breast cancer death: a Swedish Cohort Study.
    Tsau HS; Yen AM; Fann JC; Wu WY; Yu CP; Chen SL; Chiu SY; Tabár L; Kuo WH; Chen HH; Chang KJ
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 39(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25731718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Very low mammographic breast density predicts poorer outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer.
    Masarwah A; Auvinen P; Sudah M; Rautiainen S; Sutela A; Pelkonen O; Oikari S; Kosma VM; Vanninen R
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1875-82. PubMed ID: 25735512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of estrogen receptors with parenchymal pattern at mammography.
    Ciatto S; Cecchini S; Iossa A; Grazzini G; Messeri G; Valenti L; Nunzi G; Bartolucci R; Di Costanzo F
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):695-7. PubMed ID: 2916023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: value as a predictor of hormone dependency and survival in breast cancer.
    Hinton CP; Roebuck EJ; Williams MR; Blamey RW; Glaves J; Nicholson RI; Griffiths K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jun; 144(6):1103-7. PubMed ID: 3873788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: mammographic features.
    Pope TL; Fechner RE; Wilhelm MC; Wanebo HJ; de Paredes ES
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 3380984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The lymph node ratio as prognostic factor in node-positive breast cancer.
    Voordeckers M; Vinh-Hung V; Van de Steene J; Lamote J; Storme G
    Radiother Oncol; 2004 Mar; 70(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 15064006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: mammographic appearance and histologic correlation.
    Helvie MA; Hessler C; Frank TS; Ikeda DM
    Radiology; 1991 Jun; 179(3):759-64. PubMed ID: 2027988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic significance of mammographic detection in a cohort of conservatively treated breast cancer patients.
    Haffty BG; Lee C; Philpotts L; Horvath L; Ward B; McKhann C; Tocino I
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1998; 4(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9467044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.