221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8042021)
1. The effect of experience and training on the diagnosis of approximal coronal caries from bitewing radiographs. A Swiss-American comparison.
Firestone AR; Lussi A; Weems RA; Heaven TJ
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 8042021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of a computer-based image analysis program for the diagnosis of approximal caries from bitewing radiographs.
Heaven TJ; Weems RA; Firestone AR
Caries Res; 1994; 28(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8124698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic evaluation of occlusal caries: effect of training and experience.
Lazarchik DA; Firestone AR; Heaven TJ; Filler SJ; Lussi A
Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 8521436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the accuracy of Dutch dentists and dental students in the radiographic diagnosis of dentinal caries.
Mileman PA; van den Hout WB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 11803382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison between senior dental students and senior dental hygiene students.
Wojtowicz PA; Brooks SL; Hasson H; Kerschbaum WE; Eklund SA
J Dent Hyg; 2003; 77(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 15022524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of education level and experience on detection of approximal caries in digital dental radiographs. An in vitro study.
Hellén-Halme K; Petersson GH
Swed Dent J; 2010; 34(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 20701214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a young adult population.
Hopcraft MS; Morgan MV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 15853844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of radiographic occlusal and approximal caries diagnoses made by 240 dentists.
Espelid I; Tveit AB
Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Oct; 59(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 11680647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 9161171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Caries risks and appropriate intervals between bitewing x-ray examinations in schoolchildren.
Steiner M; Bühlmann S; Menghini G; Imfeld C; Imfeld T
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2011; 121(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 21318913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic recognition and distribution of approximal carious lesions in New Zealand undergraduate dental students.
Chandler NP; Ng BP; Monteith BD
N Z Dent J; 2005 Dec; 101(4):106-9. PubMed ID: 16416748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of examiner's clinical experience on the reproducibility and accuracy of radiographic examination in detecting occlusal caries.
Diniz MB; Rodrigues JA; Neuhaus KW; Cordeiro RC; Lussi A
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Oct; 14(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 19669175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8181654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit.
Ulusu T; Bodur H; Odabaş ME
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 20100920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of coronal tooth tissue in the diagnosis of apical pathosis.
Rushton VE; Qualtrough AJ; Al-Masserah Y; Rushton MN
Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):603-8. PubMed ID: 19467052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decisions on diagnosis and management of approximal caries by final-year dental students.
Maupomé G; Sheiham A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Mar; 26(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 9442626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
