These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8042598)

  • 1. Review of negative Papanicolaou tests: is the retrospective 5-year review necessary.
    Rubio CA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Aug; 102(2):266. PubMed ID: 8042598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with recent normal Papanicolaou tests.
    Berkeley AS; LiVolsi VA; Schwartz PE
    Lancet; 1980 Aug; 2(8190):375-6. PubMed ID: 6105514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Yobs AR; Swanson RA; Lamotte LC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cancer detected by cervicography in a patient with negative cervical cytology.
    Spitzer M; Krumholz BA; Seltzer VL; Molho L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Sep; 68(3 Suppl):68S-70S. PubMed ID: 3737083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pap smear refined.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of negative Papanicolaou tests. Is the retrospective 5-year review necessary?
    Allen KA; Zaleski S; Cohen MB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8279450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the accuracy of Pap smears.
    Evans TC
    Postgrad Med; 1997 Sep; 102(3):63. PubMed ID: 9300017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Update on the Papanicolaou smear: new issues for the 1990s.
    Ollayos CW
    Mil Med; 1997 Aug; 162(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 9271901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A selection of monitoring parameters for gynecologic cytology-Beacons of light for quality assurance.
    Auger M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Jan; 122(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 24203215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
    Linder J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
    Sirota RL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1237-8. PubMed ID: 9431309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. False-negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed.
    Morell ND; Taylor JR; Snyder RN; Ziel HK; Saltz A; Willie S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7088449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The false-negative fraction: a statistical method to measure the efficacy of cervical smear screening laboratories.
    Dolinar J; Ollayos CW; Tellado M; Ali I; Stevens A; Paquette C; Brodbelt S
    Mil Med; 1999 Jun; 164(6):410-1. PubMed ID: 10377709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mistakes in cytopathology.
    Shane JJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Dec; 17(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 9407216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GYN cytology--is the glass full or half empty?
    Barlow JF
    S D J Med; 1991 Apr; 44(4):90. PubMed ID: 1871579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. A study of 34 cases.
    Lee KR; Minter LJ; Granter SR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jan; 107(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 8980364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears.
    Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited.
    Greening SE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1985; 1(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3836072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences between Papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Cytopathology; 1995 Dec; 6(6):368-75. PubMed ID: 8770538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
    Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
    Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.