113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8043560)
1. Microbial growth on the surfaces of various orthodontic bonding cements.
Blunden RE; Oliver RG; O'Kane CO
Br J Orthod; 1994 May; 21(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 8043560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface roughness and droplet contact angle measurement of various orthodontic bonding cements.
O'Kane C; Oliver RG; Blunden RE
Br J Orthod; 1993 Nov; 20(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 8286299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles.
Saku S; Kotake H; Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Ohashi S; Hotta M; Horiuchi S; Hamada K; Asaoka K; Tanaka E; Yamamoto K
Dent Mater J; 2010 Mar; 29(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 20379030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents.
Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Katoh Y
Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):767-71. PubMed ID: 7568681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bonding amalgam to enamel: shear bond strength and SEM morphology.
Dhanasomboon S; Nikaido T; Shimada Y; Tagami J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 11552167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface characteristics of orthodontic materials and their effects on adhesion of mutans streptococci.
Lee SP; Lee SJ; Lim BS; Ahn SJ
Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):353-60. PubMed ID: 19216592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals.
Li XJ; Zhao SJ; Niu LN; Tay FR; Jiao K; Gao Y; Chen JH
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 24200871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glass ionomer cements used as bonding materials for metal orthodontic brackets. An in vitro study.
Oen JO; Gjerdet NR; Wisth PJ
Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 1834474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of different adhesives on work of adhesion between CAD/CAM polymers and resin composite cements.
Keul C; Müller-Hahl M; Eichberger M; Liebermann A; Roos M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1105-14. PubMed ID: 24613606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental antimicrobial orthodontic adhesives using nanofillers and silver nanoparticles.
Ahn SJ; Lee SJ; Kook JK; Lim BS
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 18632145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface characteristics of orthodontic adhesives and effects on streptococcal adhesion.
Ahn SJ; Lim BS; Lee SJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):489-95; discussion 13A. PubMed ID: 20362908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the shear bond strengths to a resin composite of two conventional and two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements.
Chadwick RG; Woolford MJ
J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8473591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthodontic bonding adhesives.
Mitchell L
Br J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 21(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 8199170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin.
de Menezes MJ; Arrais CA; Giannini M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 16911888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of different drying methods on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.
Kim YK; Min BK; Son JS; Kim KH; Kwon TY
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):954-62. PubMed ID: 24922092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
