These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8043562)

  • 21. Early orthodontic intervention followed by fixed appliance therapy in a patient with a severe Class III malocclusion and cleft lip and palate.
    Zhang H; Deng F; Wang H; Huang Q; Zhang Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):726-36. PubMed ID: 24182589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sequential directional forces treatment: two Class II case reports.
    Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Jun; 99(6):491-504. PubMed ID: 2038969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Orthodontic and orthopaedic approach in the treatment of skeletal open bite.
    Arat M; Iseri H
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Jun; 14(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 1628687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An evidence-based approach to treatment of open bite and deep bite: case reports.
    Hans MG; Teng CM; Liao CC; Chen YH; Yang CY
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 17373225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maxillary incisolabial responses in class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise.
    Owen AH
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jan; 56(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 3456736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Uprighting the mandibular molars stimulates mandibular growth during treatment of class II malocclusion.
    Miyajima K; Yoshimoto J; Murata S; Kanomi R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 9391711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force.
    Cangialosi TJ; Meistrell ME; Leung MA; Ko JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Apr; 93(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 3162641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
    Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative study of profile changes with 3 different distalization mechanics.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Ulgen AN
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 17373224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vertical skeletal change associated with Andresen, Harvold, and Begg treatment.
    Ball JV; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2032567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with a high mandibular plane angle corrected with 2-phase treatment.
    Kurosawa M; Ando K; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 19201332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Incisor repositioning: a new approach in orthodontics].
    Dallel I; Khemiri M; Fathallah S; Ben Rejeb S; Tobji S; Ben Amor A
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 26655419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report.
    Shah AH
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF; Oliveira AG
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.
    Parikakis KA; Moberg S; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18832190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic retraction of incisors in Iranian girls.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG; Amini G
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 20877736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.