These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8045062)

  • 1. Short-term recall for 'probably benign' mammographic lesions detected in a three yearly screening programme.
    Dawson JS; Wilson AR
    Clin Radiol; 1994 Jun; 49(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 8045062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
    Vizcaíno I; Gadea L; Andreo L; Salas D; Ruiz-Perales F; Cuevas D; Herranz C; Bueno F;
    Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 11323475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
    Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiology of nonpalpable breast lesions].
    Vega A; Nava E; Ortega E; Garijo F
    Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1995; 39(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 9499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Percutaneous stereotactic biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions using the Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI) system: critical evaluation of indication strategies].
    Wedegärtner U; Otto U; Buitrago-Tellez C; Bremerich J; Oertli D; Torhorst J; Bongartz G
    Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 11293864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [99mTc-MIBI characterization of breast microcalcifications. Correlations with scintigraphic and histopathologic findings].
    Vanoli C; Antronaco R; Giovanella L; Ceriani L; Sessa F; Fugazzola C
    Radiol Med; 1999; 98(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 10566292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-palpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography--review of 1182 consecutive histologically confirmed cases.
    Ciatto S; Del Turco MR; Bonardi R; Cataliotti L; Distante V; Cardona G; Bianchi S
    Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8142162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
    Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
    Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonpalpable breast lesions at biopsy. A detailed analysis of radiographic features.
    Skinner MA; Swain M; Simmons R; McCarty KS; Sullivan DC; Iglehart JD
    Ann Surg; 1988 Aug; 208(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 3401063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up.
    Kuzmiak CM; Dancel R; Pisano E; Zeng D; Cole E; Koomen MA; McLelland R
    Acad Radiol; 2006 May; 13(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 16627203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does digital mammography increase detection of high-risk breast lesions presenting as calcifications?
    Neal CH; Coletti MC; Joe A; Jeffries DO; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1148-54. PubMed ID: 24147490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions.
    Burrell HC; Pinder SE; Wilson AR; Evans AJ; Yeoman LJ; Elston CW; Ellis IO
    Clin Radiol; 1996 Apr; 51(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 8617041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
    Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
    Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of mammographic indeterminate lesions. First place winner of the Conrad Jobst Award in the Gold Medal paper competition.
    Hamby LS; McGrath PC; Stelling CB; Baker KF; Sloan DA; Kenady DE
    Am Surg; 1993 Jan; 59(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereotactic 14 gauge core-biopsy of the breast: results from 101 patients.
    Frayne J; Sterrett GF; Harvey J; Goodwin P; Townsend J; Ingram D; Parsons RW
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Sep; 66(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 8859155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.
    Burns RP; Brown JP; Roe SM; Sprouse LR; Yancey AE; Witherspoon LE
    Ann Surg; 2000 Oct; 232(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 10998652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The significance of new densities and microcalcification in the second round of breast screening.
    Hussain HK; Ng YY; Wells CA; Courts M; Nockler IB; Curling OM; Carpenter R; Perry NM
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Apr; 54(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 10210344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographic follow-up.
    Rosen EL; Baker JA; Soo MS
    Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 11930070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.