These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8046142)
1. Detection of mixed modulation using correlated and uncorrelated noise modulators. Sek A; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3511-7. PubMed ID: 8046142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation. Moore BC; Sek A J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):741-51. PubMed ID: 7930075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation. Moore BC; Sek A J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3119-31. PubMed ID: 1474227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. Moore BC; Sek A J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2320-31. PubMed ID: 8865639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation or frequency modulation) with and without background noise. Moore BC; Sek A J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):726-32. PubMed ID: 7930073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of auditory "events" based on amplitude and frequency modulation. Sek A; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2332-40. PubMed ID: 8865640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the relative phase of amplitude modulation on the detection of modulation on two carriers. Furukawa S; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3657-64. PubMed ID: 9407657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation). Moore BC; Sek A J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2468-78. PubMed ID: 7714263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dependence of frequency modulation detection on frequency modulation coherence across carriers: effects of modulation rate, harmonicity, and roving of the carrier frequencies. Furukawa S; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1632-43. PubMed ID: 9069630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of modulator asynchrony of sinusoidal and noise modulators on frequency and amplitude modulation detection interference. Gockel H; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2975-84. PubMed ID: 12509019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Across-channel processes in frequency modulation detection. Furukawa S; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2299-311. PubMed ID: 8865637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of quasitrapezoidal frequency and amplitude modulation. Sek A; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1598-604. PubMed ID: 10738813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Failure to obtain comodulation masking release with frequency-modulated maskers. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2290-2. PubMed ID: 3411020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency modulation versus amplitude modulation discrimination: evidence for a second frequency modulation encoding mechanism. Edwards BW; Viemeister NF J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):733-40. PubMed ID: 7930074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Further evidence against an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of frequency modulation (FM) incoherence between resolved frequency components. Carlyon RP J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):949-61. PubMed ID: 8132909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]