249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8046177)
1. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of subcutaneous fat thickness with high frequency pulsed ultrasound: comparisons with a caliper and a radiographic technique.
Black D; Vora J; Hayward M; Marks R
Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 3282753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of four techniques for measuring central adiposity in postpartum adolescents.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Stamm E; Scherzinger A
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11444792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of skinfold calipers as a tool for measuring body fat in human beings.
Walia BN; Bhalla AK; Suri S
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():255-7. PubMed ID: 1428065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses.
Bellisari A; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Aug; 17(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 8401751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing subcutaneous adipose tissue by simple and portable field instruments: Skinfolds versus A-mode ultrasound measurements.
Pérez-Chirinos Buxadé C; Solà-Perez T; Castizo-Olier J; Carrasco-Marginet M; Roy A; Marfell-Jones M; Irurtia A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205226. PubMed ID: 30496211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suprailiac or abdominal skinfold thickness measured with a skinfold caliper as a predictor of body density in Japanese adults.
Demura S; Sato S
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2007 Sep; 213(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 17785953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: relation between anthropometry and computed tomography.
Seidell JC; Oosterlee A; Thijssen MA; Burema J; Deurenberg P; Hautvast JG; Ruijs JH
Am J Clin Nutr; 1987 Jan; 45(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 3799506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonography and anthropometry for measuring regional body fat in HIV-infected patients.
Padilla S; Gallego JA; Masiá M; Ardoy F; Hernández I; Gutiérrez F
Curr HIV Res; 2007 Sep; 5(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 17896965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold measurements in assessment of subcutaneous and total fatness.
Borkan GA; Hults DE; Cardarelli J; Burrows BA
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1982 Jul; 58(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 7124924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue in healthy pre-pubertal children.
Goran MI; Gower BA; Treuth M; Nagy TR
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1998 Jun; 22(6):549-58. PubMed ID: 9665676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonic and skinfold caliper measures of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in elderly men and women.
Chumlea WC; Roche AF
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 3544855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of near infra-red interactance for assessment of subcutaneous and total body fat.
Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; Norgan NG; Hardman AE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jan; 49(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7713052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subcutaneous thigh fat assessment: a comparison of skinfold calipers and ultrasound imaging.
Selkow NM; Pietrosimone BG; Saliba SA
J Athl Train; 2011; 46(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 21214350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationships between computed tomography tissue areas, thicknesses and total body composition.
Borkan GA; Hults DE; Gerzof SG; Burrows BA; Robbins AH
Ann Hum Biol; 1983; 10(6):537-45. PubMed ID: 6651212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caliper vs. Lipometer--Comparing Two Methods of Subcutaneous Body Fat Measurement by Bland-Altman Diagrams.
Tafeit E; Kaimbacher PS; Wallner-Liebmann SJ; Reibnegger G; Cvirn G; Jürimäe J; Saar M; Maestu J; Purge P; Lätt E; Jürimäe T
Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):611-5. PubMed ID: 26898056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-abdominal adipose tissue in young children.
Goran MI; Kaskoun M; Shuman WP
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1995 Apr; 19(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 7627253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
