These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8046357)

  • 1. Discriminative inhibition is specific to the response-reinforcer association but not to the discriminative stimulus.
    Bonardi C; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jul; 20(3):278-91. PubMed ID: 8046357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibitory discriminative control is specific to both the response and the reinforcer.
    Bonardi C
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1989 Aug; 41(3):225-42. PubMed ID: 2798926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of reinforcer devaluation on discriminative control of instrumental behavior.
    Colwill RM; Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 2303793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ9-THC and nicotine from one operant response to another in rats.
    Troisi JR; LeMay BJ; Järbe TU
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2010 Oct; 212(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 20628732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the effects of discriminative and Pavlovian inhibitors and excitors on instrumental responding.
    Lombas AS; Kearns DN; Weiss SJ
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 18304758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DISCRIMINATIVE FUNCTIONS BASED ON A DELAY IN THE REINFORCEMENT RELATION.
    MABRY JH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1965 Mar; 8(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 14269568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Configurations of the interoceptive discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol and nicotine with two different exteroceptive contexts in rats: Extinction & recovery.
    Troisi JR; Craig EM
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():169-80. PubMed ID: 25895858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aversion to the reinforcer differentially affects conditioned reinforcement and instrumental responding.
    Wilson CL; Sherman JE; Holman EW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 7241052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for an association between the discriminative stimulus and the response-outcome association in instrumental learning.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Oct; 16(4):326-34. PubMed ID: 2230657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does a negative discriminative stimulus function as a punishing consequence?
    Bland VJ; Cowie S; Elliffe D; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jul; 110(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 29926923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Involvement of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor subtypes in the discriminative-stimulus effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in rats.
    Solinas M; Goldberg SR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Jun; 179(4):804-12. PubMed ID: 15619107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction of response error versus stimulus error in the extinction of discriminated operant learning.
    Bouton ME; Thrailkill EA; Trask S; Alfaro F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 32718156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning to inhibit the response during instrumental (operant) extinction.
    Bouton ME; Trask S; Carranza-Jasso R
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 27379715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator.
    Astley SL; Peissig JJ; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):252-68. PubMed ID: 11497324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EFFECT OF PRIOR PAVLOVIAN DISCRIMINATION TRAINING UPON LEARNING AN OPERANT DISCRIMINATION.
    BOWER G; GRUSEC T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Nov; 7(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 14238906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination.
    Pierrel R; Blue S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 6080833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.