These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8046577)

  • 1. Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample.
    Sprecher S; Sullivan Q; Hatfield E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Jun; 66(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 8046577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
    Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.
    O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age difference asymmetry and a two-sex perspective.
    Ni Bhrolchain M
    Eur J Popul; 1992; 8(1):23-45. PubMed ID: 12158964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Impact of Health, Wealth, and Attractiveness on Romantic Evaluation from Photographs of Faces.
    Tskhay KO; Clout JM; Rule NO
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Nov; 46(8):2365-2376. PubMed ID: 28255792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.
    Moore F; Cassidy C; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 8(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 22947829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age and gender differences in sexual behavior preferences: a follow-up report.
    Purnine DM; Carey MP
    J Sex Marital Ther; 1998; 24(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 9611689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do women's preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle?
    Jünger J; Motta-Mena NV; Cardenas R; Bailey D; Rosenfield KA; Schild C; Penke L; Puts DA
    Horm Behav; 2018 Nov; 106():122-134. PubMed ID: 30342884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Sexually Dimorphic Are Human Mate Preferences?
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Pham MN; Shackelford TK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1082-93. PubMed ID: 26068718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model.
    Feingold A
    Psychol Bull; 1992 Jul; 112(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 1388281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of postgraduate students' endogamous preference in mate selection.
    Saroja K; Surendra HS
    Indian J Behav; 1991 Jan; 15(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12318133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.
    Atari M
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917702459. PubMed ID: 28401792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social transmission of face preferences among humans.
    Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Burriss RP; Feinberg DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 274(1611):899-903. PubMed ID: 17251104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.