These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8047646)

  • 1. Nurses fail to keep physicians informed of multiple seizures. Case in point: Glassman v. St. Joseph Hospital 631 N.E. 2d 1186--IL (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jun; 35(1):4. PubMed ID: 8047646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses fail to respond: "loss of chance"--death. Case in point: Ard v. East Jefferson General Hospital 636 So. 2d 1042 LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Aug; 35(3):2. PubMed ID: 7938493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurses fail to listen to patient's complaints. Case in point: Harmon v. Patel 617 N.E. 2d 183--IL (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Oct; 34(5):2. PubMed ID: 8248493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physicians not qualified as experts on nursing care. Case on point: Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 2004 WL 228956 N.E.2d--IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Mar; 44(10):4. PubMed ID: 15085702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can nurses be compelled to testify against co-workers? Case in point: Cenkovich v. Almeida 634 N.E. 2d 30--IL (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Aug; 35(3):4. PubMed ID: 7938495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):2. PubMed ID: 7816924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posey restrained pt. chokes--brain damage: immunity issue. Case in point: Allen v. Montgomery Hosp. 668 A. 2d 565--PA (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Feb; 36(9):4. PubMed ID: 8711129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polygraph tests for nurses ordered. Case in point: Marsh v. Lake Forest Hospital (519 N.E. 2d 504 (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):2. PubMed ID: 3368575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. $1.75 million verdict vs. CRNA upheld: damage cap void.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Aug; 37(3):1. PubMed ID: 8920458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nursing records "missing": spoilation of evidence. Case in point: Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in Wash. 881 P. 2d 304--AK (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):2. PubMed ID: 7838971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attorney ordered to turn over nurse's notes. Case on point: Cangelosi v. Capasso, no. 2-05-0643 (Ill app. 05/30/2006) N.E.2d-IL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jul; 47(2):4. PubMed ID: 16937914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are you held to the standard of a nurse specialist? Case in point: Northern Trust Co. v. Louis A. Weiss Mem. Hosp. (493 N.E. 2d 5 - IL).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Aug; 27(3):2. PubMed ID: 3638741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain v. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):2. PubMed ID: 7972845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurse's failure to phone M.D.: hospital liability. Case in point: Nutty v. Jewish Hospital (571 F. Supp. 1050-IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Jan; 24(8):2. PubMed ID: 6560672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.