176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8050558)
1. Portable peak flow meters: physical characteristics, influence of temperature, altitude, and humidity.
Pedersen OF; Miller MR; Sigsgaard T; Tidley M; Harding RM
Eur Respir J; 1994 May; 7(5):991-7. PubMed ID: 8050558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of altitude on spirometric parameters and the performance of peak flow meters.
Pollard AJ; Mason NP; Barry PW; Pollard RC; Collier DJ; Fraser RS; Miller MR; Milledge JS
Thorax; 1996 Feb; 51(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 8711651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency response of variable orifice type peak flow meters: requirements and testing.
Pedersen OF; Rasmussen TR; Kjaergaard SK; Miller MR; Quanjer PH
Eur Respir J; 1995 May; 8(5):849-55. PubMed ID: 7656961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Peak Flow Working Group: test of portable peak flow meters by explosive decompression.
Pedersen OF; Miller MR
Eur Respir J Suppl; 1997 Feb; 24():23S-25S. PubMed ID: 9098705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peak expiratory flow at increased barometric pressure: comparison of peak flow meters and volumetric spirometer.
Thomas PS; Ng C; Bennett M
Clin Sci (Lond); 2000 Jan; 98(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 10600666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gas compression artefacts when testing peak expiratory flow meters with mechanically-driven syringes.
Navajas D; Roca J; Farré R; Rotger M
Eur Respir J; 1997 Apr; 10(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 9150332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accuracy of portable peak flow meters.
Miller MR; Dickinson SA; Hitchings DJ
Thorax; 1992 Nov; 47(11):904-9. PubMed ID: 1465746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peak expiratory flow at altitude.
Thomas PS; Harding RM; Milledge JS
Thorax; 1990 Aug; 45(8):620-2. PubMed ID: 2402726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the assess peak flow meter on human volunteers.
Venkatesan EA; Walter S; Ray D
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1994 Oct; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 7883294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency response of portable PEF meters.
Hankinson JL; Das MK
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1995 Aug; 152(2):702-6. PubMed ID: 7633729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of peak expiratory flow rates obtained with the Morgan Spirocheck and a Mini Peak Flow Meter.
Singh HD; Subrahmanyam S; Varagunan M
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1997 Jan; 41(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 10225042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Assessment of 2 portable peak expiratory flow meters and reference values for students 6 to 16 years of age].
Cobos Barroso N; Reverté Bover C; Liñán Cortés S
An Esp Pediatr; 1996 Dec; 45(6):619-25. PubMed ID: 9133228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Portable peak flow meters.
McNaughton JP
Eur Respir J Suppl; 1997 Feb; 24():26S-28S. PubMed ID: 9098706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Serial lung function variability using four portable logging meters.
Moore VC; Parsons NR; Jaakkola MS; Burge CB; Pantin CF; Robertson AS; Burge PS
J Asthma; 2009 Nov; 46(9):961-6. PubMed ID: 19905927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inaccuracy of portable peak flow meters: correction is not needed. Dutch CNSLD Study Group.
Brand PL; Waalkens HJ; Duiverman EJ; van Essen-Zandvliet EE
Acta Paediatr; 1997 Aug; 86(8):888-9. PubMed ID: 9307172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Measurement of peak expiratory flow and altitude].
Massen H; Boissinot E; Moline J
Cah Anesthesiol; 1986; 34(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 3756572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diurnal variation of PEF and its use in epidemiological studies.
Lebowitz MD; Krzyzanowski M; Quackenboss JJ; O'Rourke MK
Eur Respir J Suppl; 1997 Feb; 24():49S-56S. PubMed ID: 9098711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inadequate peak expiratory flow meter characteristics detected by a computerised explosive decompression device.
Miller MR; Atkins PR; Pedersen OF
Thorax; 2003 May; 58(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 12728161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gas compression in lungs decreases peak expiratory flow depending on resistance of peak flowmeter.
Pedersen OF; Pedersen TF; Miller MR
J Appl Physiol (1985); 1997 Nov; 83(5):1517-21. PubMed ID: 9375314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mini-Wright peak flow meters are reliable after 5 years use. Dutch CNSLD Study Group.
Douma WR; van der Mark TW; Folgering HT; Kort E; Kerstjens HA; Koëter GH; Postma DS
Eur Respir J; 1997 Feb; 10(2):457-9. PubMed ID: 9042649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
