BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8051801)

  • 1. [Practical application of receiver operating characteristic curve on laboratory diagnosis].
    Matsuo S; Takahashi H
    Rinsho Byori; 1994 Jun; 42(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 8051801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
    Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lipase and pancreatic amylase activities in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in patients with hyperamylasemia.
    Yang RW; Shao ZX; Chen YY; Yin Z; Wang WJ
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Nov; 4(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 16286272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The application of medical decision making to the mass screening: the basic principles on ROC analysis].
    Tsji I
    Rinsho Byori; 1990 May; 38(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 2199711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of 24-hour oesophageal pH-metry for the detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants: what is the ideal score and the optimal threshold? A receiver-operating-characteristic analysis.
    Carroccio A; Cavataio F; Acierno E; Montalto G; Lorello D; Tumminello M; Soresi M; Li Voti G; Iacono G
    Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1997 Aug; 29(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 9476179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cut-off-independent tumour marker evaluation using ROC approximation.
    Bitterlich N; Schneider J
    Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(6C):4305-10. PubMed ID: 18214036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of a chest pain diagnostic protocol to exclude acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.
    Zalenski RJ; McCarren M; Roberts R; Rydman RJ; Jovanovic B; Das K; Mendez J; el-Khadra M; Fraker L; McDermott M
    Arch Intern Med; 1997 May; 157(10):1085-91. PubMed ID: 9164374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.
    Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the diagnostic value of plasma endothelin for diabetic retinopathy using the receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Zhu H; Shi CH
    Ophthalmic Res; 2007; 39(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17851270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance indicators and validity of serum fructosamine assay as a diagnostic test in a screening program for diabetes mellitus.
    Mula-Abed WA; Al-Naemi AH
    Saudi Med J; 2003 May; 24(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 12847621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
    Obuchowski NA
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new strategy for the application of CA19-9 in the differentiation of pancreaticobiliary cancer: analysis using a receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Kim HJ; Kim MH; Myung SJ; Lim BC; Park ET; Yoo KS; Seo DW; Lee SK; Min YI
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jul; 94(7):1941-6. PubMed ID: 10406263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When is a test positive? The use of decision analysis to optimize test interpretation.
    Bergus GR
    Fam Med; 1993; 25(10):656-60. PubMed ID: 8288070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ROC methodology within a monitoring framework.
    Parker CB; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(22):3473-88. PubMed ID: 14601014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Johnson NP
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation.
    Beck JR; Shultz EK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Jan; 110(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 3753562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves in the diagnostic evaluation of liver fibrosis markers: impact of biopsy length and fragmentation.
    Poynard T; Halfon P; Castera L; Charlotte F; Le Bail B; Munteanu M; Messous D; Ratziu V; Benhamou Y; Bourlière M; De Ledinghen V;
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Mar; 25(6):733-9. PubMed ID: 17311607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.
    Michener LA; Walsworth MK; Doukas WC; Murphy KP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19887215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.