97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8054211)
21. The effect of montelukast (10mg daily) and loratadine (10mg daily) on wheal, flare and itching reactions in skin prick tests.
Kupczyk M; Kupryś I; Górski P; Kuna P
Pulm Pharmacol Ther; 2007; 20(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16516511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reproducibility of histamine skin prick test. Inter- and intravariation using histamine dihydrochloride 1, 5, and 10 mg/ml.
Taudorf E; Malling HJ; Laursen LC; Lanner A; Weeke B
Allergy; 1985 Jul; 40(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 4037255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The longest wheal diameter is the optimal measurement for the evaluation of skin prick tests.
Konstantinou GN; Bousquet PJ; Zuberbier T; Papadopoulos NG
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2010; 151(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 19851076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Critical evaluation of the use of skin tests and cellular tests in standardization of allergens.
de Weck AL; Derer T
Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M; 1994; (87):89-114; discussion 114-7. PubMed ID: 7873071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. B scanning evaluation of allergic reactions with binary transformation and image analysis.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 175():3-7. PubMed ID: 1502863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ranitidine (150 mg daily) inhibits wheal, flare, and itching reactions in skin-prick tests.
Kupczyk M; Kupryś I; Bocheńska-Marciniak M; Górski P; Kuna P
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 18201437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of inhibition of wheal response to histamine by multiple doses of terfenadine.
Ryan WM
Ann Allergy; 1989 Dec; 63(6 Pt 2):609-11. PubMed ID: 2574553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. B scanning evaluation of irritant reactions with binary transformation and image analysis.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 175():9-13. PubMed ID: 1502864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device.
Seys SF; Gorris S; Uyttebroek S; Backaert W; Jorissen M; Schrijvers R; Daems R; Loeckx D; Van Gerven L; Hellings PW
Front Allergy; 2023; 4():1289031. PubMed ID: 38026131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Inhibition of histamine-induced wheel after a recommended single dose administration of 10 mg cetirizine, 5 mg desloratadine, 120 i 180 mg fexofenadine, 5 mg levocetirizine and 10 mg loratadine--a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial].
Kruszewski J; Kłos K; Sułek K
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2006 Nov; 21(125):443-8. PubMed ID: 17345837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cerebral lateralization and histamine skin test asymmetries in humans.
Wise SL; Meador KJ; Thompson WO; Avery SS; Loring DW; Wray BB
Ann Allergy; 1993 Apr; 70(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 8466098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of the Efficacy of Antihistamines in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Based on Initial Suppression of the Histamine- Induced Wheal.
Sánchez J; Zakzuk J; Cardona R
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2016; 26(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 27326985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Specific sensitization to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and cutaneous reactivity to histamine in Brazilian children.
Halász MR; Gonsales SL; Solé D; Naspitz CK
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 1997; 7(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 9161934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Histamine, but not leukotriene C4, is an essential mediator in cold urticaria wheals.
Nuutinen P; Harvima IT; Ackermann L
Acta Derm Venereol; 2007; 87(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17225008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Circadian variations of histamine binding to lymphocytes and neutrophils and skin reactivity to histamine in atopic and healthy subjects.
Zak-Nejmark T; Nowak IA; Kraus-Filarska M
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2006; 54(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 16868722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Suppression of histamine- and allergen-induced skin reactions: comparison of first- and second-generation antihistamines.
dos Santos RV; Magerl M; Mlynek A; Lima HC
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2009 Jun; 102(6):495-9. PubMed ID: 19558008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation of skin prick test reactions with a scanning program.
Pijnenborg H; Nilsson L; Dreborg S
Allergy; 1996 Nov; 51(11):782-8. PubMed ID: 8947335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the antihistamine effects of olopatadine, cetirizine and fexofenadine during a 24 h period: a double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled comparison in skin responses induced by histamine iontophoresis.
Takahashi H; Zhang Y; Morita E
Arch Dermatol Res; 2008 Jul; 300(6):291-5. PubMed ID: 18305947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of skin test reactivity to histamine on back and forearm in young children.
Yuenyongviwat A; Koonrangsesomboon D; Sangsupawanich P
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2012 Dec; 30(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 23393910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Inhibition of the cutaneous response to histamine by H1-blocking agents. Quantitative evaluation of microvascular changes in the skin after histamine challenge and a comparison of the effects of a single intake of cetirizine and terfenadine.
Van Neste D; Rihoux JP
Skin Pharmacol; 1988; 1(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 2908486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
