BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8054298)

  • 1. Dento-skeletal components of class II malocclusions for children with normal and retruded mandibles.
    Sarhan OA; Hashim HA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 8054298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dento-skeletal components of class III malocclusions for children with normal and protruded mandibles.
    Hashim HA; Sarhan OA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1993; 18(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 8110606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study.
    Chung CH; Wong WW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 12490873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of cranial base growth in Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.
    Wilhelm BM; Beck FM; Lidral AC; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 11298313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion.
    Mouakeh M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 11395709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
    Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A cephalometric study on Twin-block appliance for treatment of early skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Liu Y; Liu YH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):569-72. PubMed ID: 16400480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skull thickness in patients with skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions.
    Arntsen T; Kjaer I; Sonnesen L
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18950320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skeletal and dental arch asymmetries in Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusions.
    de Araujo TM; Wilhelm RS; Almeida MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 8054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cephalometric study on craniofacial morphology of Iranian children with beta-thalassemia major.
    Amini F; Jafari A; Eslamian L; Sharifzadeh S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Feb; 10(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17284245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentoskeletal treatment changes in Class II subdivision malocclusions in submentovertex and posteroanterior radiographs.
    Janson G; Cruz KS; Woodside DG; Metaxas A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Oct; 126(4):451-63. PubMed ID: 15470348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.