These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8054298)

  • 21. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variation in dentofacial morphology and occlusion in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subjects: a case-control study.
    Hu Y; Billiau AD; Verdonck A; Wouters C; Carels C
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 19164412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dentofacial features of children with distal occlusions, large overjets, and deepbites in the early mixed dentition.
    Keski-Nisula K; Keski-Nisula L; Mäkelä P; Mäki-Torkko T; Varrela J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 16979486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
    Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
    Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances.
    Yoshida I; Yamaguchi N; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anteroposterior and vertical components of class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion.
    Al-Khateeb EA; Al-Khateeb SN
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):859-66. PubMed ID: 19705928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Cephalometric analysis in individuals with Class II/2 malocclusions].
    Rak D
    Stomatol Glas Srb; 1990 Jun; 37(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 2131666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Mini-plate implant anchorage for maxillary protraction in Class III malocclusion].
    Ding P; Zhou YH; Lin Y; Qiu LX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 May; 42(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 17686275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Differences in maxillary growth vector of skeletal class I with various vertical growth types before and after growth spurts].
    Feng XX; Zhang LK; Li WP; Xu MT; Zhang YF; Ye R; Li J; Li JH; Zhao MY; Zhao ZH
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Mar; 42(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 21500567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
    Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Dento-facial structural characteristics in Angle Class II malocclusion associated with abnormal facial divergency].
    Wu KM; Chen YJ; Cheng MC; Chang HF; Chen KC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S130-8. PubMed ID: 1358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal Class II cases.
    Ozbek MM; Memikoglu TU; Gögen H; Lowe AA; Baspinar E
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Aug; 68(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 9709833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class I subjects with low, average, and high MP-SN angles: a longitudinal study.
    Chung CH; Mongiovi VD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):670-8. PubMed ID: 14666080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.