162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8054757)
1. In vitro and in vivo experimental evaluation of a new vena caval filter.
Qian Z; Yasui K; Nazarian GK; Vlodaver Z; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8054757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of clinically available inferior vena cava filters with an in vitro physiologic simulation of the vena cava.
Simon M; Rabkin DJ; Kleshinski S; Kim D; Ransil BJ
Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 8234702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of filters in an oversized vena caval phantom: intracaval placement of a bird's nest filter versus biiliac placement of Greenfield, Vena Tech-LGM, and Simon nitinol filters.
Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Pentecost MJ; Teitelbaum GP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Aug; 3(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1515730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro study of guide wire entrapment in currently available inferior vena cava filters.
Stavropoulos SW; Itkin M; Trerotola SO
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jul; 14(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 12847198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of vena cava filters.
Hammer FD; Rousseau HP; Joffre FG; Sentenac BP; Tran-Van T; Barthelemy RP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 7873867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clover leaf inferior vena cava filter: in vitro evaluation of filter deployment and comparison of emboli-capturing ability.
Palestrant AM; Faykus MH
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1991 Feb; 2(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 1799740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental comparison of percutaneous vena caval devices: titanium Greenfield filter versus bird's nest filter.
Burke PE; Michna BA; Harvey CF; Crute SL; Sobel M; Greenfield LJ
J Vasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 6(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 3599283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute clot-trapping efficiency in dogs with compacted versus elongated wires in bird's nest filters.
Carlson JE; Yedlicka JW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Hunter DW; Amplatz K
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1993; 4(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 8353348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness.
Becker DM; Philbrick JT; Selby JB
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 152(10):1985-94. PubMed ID: 1417371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the LGM (Vena Tech) and titanium Greenfield filters in vivo.
Millward SF; Marsh JI; Pon C; Moher D
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Feb; 3(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 1540709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Vena cava filter for prevention of pulmonary embolism].
Winkler WB; Slany J
Vasa; 1999 Nov; 28(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 10611842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo evaluation of vena caval filters: can function be linked to design characteristics?
Proctor MC; Cho KJ; Greenfield LJ
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 11232895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics.
Katsamouris AA; Waltman AC; Delichatsios MA; Athanasoulis CA
Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 3336712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early duplex scan evaluation of four vena caval interruption devices.
Aswad MA; Sandager GP; Pais SO; Malloy PC; Killewich LA; Lilly MP; Flinn WR
J Vasc Surg; 1996 Nov; 24(5):809-18. PubMed ID: 8918328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifacts of vena cava filters ex vivo on MR angiography.
Honda M; Obuchi M; Sugimoto H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Jul; 2(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 16210823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters.
Mohan CR; Hoballah JJ; Sharp WJ; Kresowik TF; Lu CT; Corson JD
J Vasc Surg; 1995 Feb; 21(2):235-45; discussion 245-6. PubMed ID: 7853597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New retrievable percutaneous vena cava filter: experimental in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Neuerburg J; Günther RW; Rassmussen E; Vorwerk D; Tonn K; Handt S; Küpper W; Hansen JV
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1993; 16(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 8402784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suprarenal vena caval filter placement: follow-up of four filter types in 22 patients.
Matchett WJ; Jones MP; McFarland DR; Ferris EJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1998; 9(4):588-93. PubMed ID: 9684828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of incompletely opened Vena Tech-LGM vena caval filters.
Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Kokoris SP; Teitelbaum GP
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1993; 16(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8435832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro comparison of the hemodynamics of two inferior vena cava filters.
Couch GG; Johnston KW; Ojha M
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Mar; 31(3):539-49. PubMed ID: 10709068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
