These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8054762)

  • 1. The attractiveness of the Droop equations. II. Generic uptake and growth functions.
    Oyarzun FJ; Lange K
    Math Biosci; 1994 Jun; 121(2):127-39. PubMed ID: 8054762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The attractiveness of the Droop equations.
    Lange K; Oyarzun FJ
    Math Biosci; 1992 Oct; 111(2):261-78. PubMed ID: 1515747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mechanistic investigation of the algae growth "Droop" model.
    Lemesle V; Mailleret L
    Acta Biotheor; 2008 Jun; 56(1-2):87-102. PubMed ID: 18247135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stability in chemostat equations with delayed nutrient recycling.
    Beretta E; Bischi GI; Solimano F
    J Math Biol; 1990; 28(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 2307915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quiescence and transient growth dynamics in chemostat models.
    Jäger W; Krömker S; Tang B
    Math Biosci; 1994 Feb; 119(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 8142697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual-based modeling of phytoplankton: evaluating approaches for applying the cell quota model.
    Hellweger FL; Kianirad E
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Dec; 249(3):554-65. PubMed ID: 17900626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mathematical modelling of avascular-tumour growth.
    Ward JP; King JR
    IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 14(1):39-69. PubMed ID: 9080687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oscillations in a model of repression with external control.
    Mahaffy JM; Jorgensen DA; Vanderheyden RL
    J Math Biol; 1992; 30(7):669-91. PubMed ID: 1522391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chaos in a periodically forced chemostat with algal mortality.
    Clodong S; Blasius B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Aug; 271(1548):1617-24. PubMed ID: 15306309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transient behavior of biological loop models with application to the Droop model.
    Bernard O; Gouzé JL
    Math Biosci; 1995 May; 127(1):19-43. PubMed ID: 7734856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competition between plasmid-bearing and plasmid-free organisms in a chemostat with nutrient recycling and an inhibitor.
    Yuan S; Xiao D; Han M
    Math Biosci; 2006 Jul; 202(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 16797043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impulse response of Chlamydomonas reinhardii in nitrite-limited chemostat culture.
    Cunningham A
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1984 Dec; 26(12):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18551673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymptotic behavior of nonlinear semigroup describing a model of selective cell growth regulation.
    Arino O; Kimmel M
    J Math Biol; 1991; 29(4):289-314. PubMed ID: 2061696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global stability in a delayed partial differential equation describing cellular replication.
    Mackey MC; Rudnicki R
    J Math Biol; 1994; 33(1):89-109. PubMed ID: 7836872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting stability of mixed microbial cultures from single species experiments: 2. Physiological model.
    Pilyugin SS; Reeves GT; Narang A
    Math Biosci; 2004 Dec; 192(2):111-36. PubMed ID: 15627489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to determine control of growth rate in a chemostat. Using metabolic control analysis to resolve the paradox.
    Snoep JL; Jensen PR; Groeneveld P; Molenaar D; Kholodenko BN; Westerhoff HV
    Biochem Mol Biol Int; 1994 Aug; 33(5):1023-32. PubMed ID: 7987249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kinetic modeling of growth and lipid body induction in Chlorella pyrenoidosa under heterotrophic conditions.
    Sachdeva N; Kumar GD; Gupta RP; Mathur AS; Manikandan B; Basu B; Tuli DK
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Oct; 218():934-43. PubMed ID: 27450124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for intrapopulation variability in biogeochemical models using agent-based methods.
    Hellweger FL; Kianirad E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(8):2855-60. PubMed ID: 17533849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbial growth dynamics on the basis of individual budgets.
    Kooijman SA; Muller EB; Stouthamer AH
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1991; 60(3-4):159-74. PubMed ID: 1807193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Population dynamics and competition in chemostat models with adaptive nutrient uptake.
    Tang B; Sitomer A; Jackson T
    J Math Biol; 1997 Mar; 35(4):453-79. PubMed ID: 9104013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.