These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8055370)
21. Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems. Svendsen OL; Marslew U; Hassager C; Christiansen C Eur J Nucl Med; 1992; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 1547807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA. Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer. Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A). Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretation of whole body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measures in children: comparison with peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Leonard MB; Shults J; Elliott DM; Stallings VA; Zemel BS Bone; 2004 Jun; 34(6):1044-52. PubMed ID: 15193552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Long-term precision of DXA scanning assessed over seven years in forty postmenopausal women. Patel R; Blake GM; Rymer J; Fogelman I Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 10663361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS). Pedrazzoni M; Girasole G; Bertoldo F; Bianchi G; Cepollaro C; Del Puente A; Giannini S; Gonnelli S; Maggio D; Marcocci C; Minisola S; Palummeri E; Rossini M; Sartori L; Sinigaglia L Osteoporos Int; 2003 Dec; 14(12):978-82. PubMed ID: 14530829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term in vitro precision of single slice peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT): multicenter comparison. Guglielmi G; Cammisa M; De Serio A; Giannatempo GM; Bagni B; Orlandi G; Russo CR Technol Health Care; 1997 Nov; 5(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 9476316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Tothill P; Hannan WJ Osteoporos Int; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1515-23. PubMed ID: 17483864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss. Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of a new positioner on the precision of hip bone mineral density measurements. Hans D; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Horn S; Avioli LV; Drezner MK; Meunier PJ J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Aug; 12(8):1289-94. PubMed ID: 9258760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of rates of bone loss from the spine measured using two manufacturers' densitometers. Peel NF; Eastell R J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Nov; 10(11):1796-801. PubMed ID: 8592958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers. Rencken ML; Murano R; Drinkwater BL; Chesnut CH Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Apr; 48(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 2059876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bone mass assessment in rats by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Gala Paniagua J; Díaz-Curiel M; de la Piedra Gordo C; Castilla Reparaz C; Torralbo García M Br J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 71(847):754-8. PubMed ID: 9771386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur. Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice. El Maghraoui A; Do Santos Zounon AA; Jroundi I; Nouijai A; Ghazi M; Achemlal L; Bezza A; Tazi MA; Abouqual R Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1742-8. PubMed ID: 15937633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database. Benmalek A; Sabatier JP Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10326063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. Cawte SA; Pearson D; Green DJ; Maslanka WB; Miller CG; Rogers AT Br J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 72(856):354-62. PubMed ID: 10474496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography. Wang L; Su Y; Wang Q; Duanmu Y; Yang M; Yi C; Cheng X Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6284. PubMed ID: 28740145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]