These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A guide to evaluating hypotheses and definitions of variables. Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Dec; 12(8):98-103. PubMed ID: 1288958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research Intervention Fidelity: Tips to Improve Internal Validity of Your Intervention Studies. Siedlecki SL Clin Nurse Spec; 2018; 32(1):12-14. PubMed ID: 29200034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Resources for critically appraising quantitative research evidence for nursing practice. Duffy ME Clin Nurse Spec; 2005; 19(5):233-5. PubMed ID: 16179852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating quantitative research designs: Part 1. Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Oct; 14(5):100-2. PubMed ID: 7859458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What future for research in mental health nursing: share the objective statistics! Parsons S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 9807359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating quantitative research problems. Finnick M; Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Jun; 12(5):98-105. PubMed ID: 1597067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. So where are we? Forbes K Clin Nurse Spec; 1999 Jul; 13(4):182. PubMed ID: 10690055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Practice-based research in maternity nursing: issues and examples from studies of labor and birth. Roberts J Appl Nurs Res; 1992 May; 5(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 1642493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What future for research in mental health nursing: rejoinder to Parsons, Beech and Rolfe. Gournay K; Ritter S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 9807357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The 'pear-shaped' doctoral thesis and how to avoid it! Johnson M; Burnard P Nurse Educ Today; 2002 Jul; 22(5):355-7. PubMed ID: 12383734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the biased coin design for randomization in health care research. Hjelm-Karlsson K West J Nurs Res; 1991 Apr; 13(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 2048317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The marriage of heaven and hell: further remarks on the future for mental health research. Rolfe G J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 9807358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative and qualitative research methods: advantages of complementary usage. Lederman RP MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1991; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 1900905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative vs qualitative research. Brink H Nurs RSA; 1991 Jan; 6(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 2011171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In response to Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60 (1), 79-86. Rolfe G J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):108-9. PubMed ID: 17824944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]