These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8055499)

  • 1. Clinical assessment of the INTERPLAK toothbrush vs a conventional brush plus floss.
    Love JW; Drisko CL; Killoy WJ; Tira DE; Love JD
    Compend Suppl; 1993; (16):S587-8, S593-8; quiz S612-4. PubMed ID: 8055499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.
    Barnes CM; Russell CM; Reinhardt RA; Payne JB; Lyle DM
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(3):71-7. PubMed ID: 16305005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The elmex SENSITIVE toothbrush: effect on plaque reduction and subjective satisfaction after two months.
    Sgan-Cohen HD; Livny A; Vered Y
    J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18500156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype manual toothbrush versus an ADA reference manual toothbrush with and without dental floss.
    Terezhalmy GT; Bsoul SA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Aug; 6(3):1-13. PubMed ID: 16127467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical trial of the INTERPLAK powered toothbrush in a geriatric population.
    Blahut P
    Compend Suppl; 1993; (16):S606-10; quiz S612-4. PubMed ID: 8055501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical comparison of plaque removal and gingival bleeding reduction by two different brush heads on a sonic toothbrush.
    Harpenau L
    J Clin Dent; 2000; 11(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 11460280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interproximal vs midradicular effects of a counter-rotational powered brush during supportive periodontal therapy.
    Yukna RA; Shaklee RL
    Compend Suppl; 1993; (16):S580-6; quiz S612-4. PubMed ID: 8055498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of an electric toothbrush on plaque removal in periodontal patients.
    Howorko N; Gutek M; Naidoo S; Hoover JN
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 8329164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term clinical study comparing supragingival plaque removal and gingival bleeding reduction of the Philips Jordan HP735 to a manual toothbrush in periodontal patients in a maintenance program.
    Steenackers K; Vijt J; Leroy R; De Vree H; De Boever JA
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11475708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and cost effectiveness of the counter-rotational brush in private practice.
    Killoy WJ; Love JW; Love JD; Tira DE
    Compend Suppl; 1993; (16):S599-605; quiz S612-4. PubMed ID: 8055500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of the Sonicare sonic toothbrush on reduction of plaque, gingivitis, probing pocket depth and subgingival bacteria in adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Ho HP; Niederman R
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(1 Spec No):15-9. PubMed ID: 9487840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blinded clinical evaluation of a new manual toothbrush.
    Harpenau L; Meyers G; Lyon C; Chambers D; Lundergan W
    J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 16838873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new in vivo interdental sampling method comparing a daily flossing regime versus a manual brush control.
    Bellamy P; Barlow A; Puri G; Wright KI; Mussett A; Zhou X
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):59-65. PubMed ID: 15688960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a new flossing device.
    Pucher J; Jayaprakash P; Aftyka T; Sigman L; Van Swol R
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Apr; 26(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 7568747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of three power toothbrushes.
    Sharma NC; Lyle DM; Qaqish JG; Galustians J
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 8(3):83-8. PubMed ID: 16865997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluations of plaque removal efficacy: an advanced rotating-oscillating power toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush.
    Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD; Walters PA; Warren PR; Cugini M; Goyal CR; Qaqish J
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):106-11. PubMed ID: 18277740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative effectiveness of the Interplak electric rotary toothbrush].
    De Beule F; Bercy P
    J Parodontol; 1990 Feb; 9(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2384876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical trial of the meridol toothbrush with conical filaments: evaluation of clinical effectiveness and subjective satisfaction.
    Sgan-Cohen HD; Vered Y
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(4):109-13. PubMed ID: 16583594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
    Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.