These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8056167)

  • 21. Effect of Different Cavity Lining Techniques on Marginal Sealing of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
    Pedram P; Hooshmand T; Heidari S
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(6):895–901. PubMed ID: 30106395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
    Shortall AC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):706-10. PubMed ID: 2277155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Glass-ionomer restoratives and liners: shear bond strength to dentin.
    Bell RB; Barkmeier WW
    J Esthet Dent; 1994; 6(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 7803139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Lining Materials on Shear Bond Strength for Composite Restorations In Vitro.
    Caneppele TM; Bresciani E; Da Silva Ávila DM; Barcellos DC; Pucci CR
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2017; 37(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 27977829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of glass ionomer cement on the dental pulp and its efficacy as a base material.
    Yakushiji M; Kinumatsu T; Fuchino T; Machida Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1979 May; 20(2):47-59. PubMed ID: 296906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pulpal uptake of mercury from lined amalgam restorations in guinea pigs.
    Akyüz S; Caglar E
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Dec; 110(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 12507220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Glass ionomer liners: a clinical technique.
    Quiroz L; Swift EJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1986 Feb; 7(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 3456883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Glass ionomer-composite sandwich technique.
    Suzuki M; Jordan RE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 2404044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Study to evaluate the Efficacy of Resin-modified Glass lonomer Cement Liner as a Direct Pulp Capping Material.
    Shameem A; Muliyar S; Thankachan RP; Kalliath JT; Mangalath U; Mangalath S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1065-1071. PubMed ID: 30287705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Experimental study of the effect of a photopolymerizable glass ionomer cavity liner on pulp pressure and temperature].
    Deux D; Bonin P; Boivin R; Poulard J
    Rev Fr Endod; 1990 Sep; 9(3):25-30. PubMed ID: 2236735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation on microleakage in composite restorations with glass ionomer liners.
    Arcoria CJ; Gonzalez JP; Vitasek BA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Jan; 19(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1533870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cavity sealers, liners, and bases: current philosophies and indications for use.
    Hilton TJ
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):134-46. PubMed ID: 8957903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pulpal response to restorative procedures and materials.
    Barnett F
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():93-8. PubMed ID: 1520947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical placement of modern glass-ionomer cements.
    Mount GJ
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8511271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laser and curing light induced in vitro pulpal temperature changes.
    Powell GL; Anderson JR; Blankenau RJ
    J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1999 Feb; 17(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10204441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.