243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8057179)
1. Supreme Court decision affects bargaining rights of nurses.
Furmidge ML; Barter M
J Nurs Adm; 1994; 24(7-8):9-11. PubMed ID: 8057179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is the Supreme Court doing to nursing?
Wolfe S
RN; 1994 Dec; 57(12):59-60, 63-4. PubMed ID: 7817141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nursing practice implications of Supreme Court decision on nurses as supervisors.
Colo Nurse; 1994 Dec; 94(4):4. PubMed ID: 7834666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supervisory status of charge nurses: Supreme Court ends controversy.
Sussman ML; Bryant MR
Caring; 1995 Jan; 14(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10140142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unions, nurses, and the health care industry: recent administrative and judicial developments.
Alper BR; Miller SO
J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(2):65-72, 117. PubMed ID: 10141470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nursing practice implications of court decision.
Nev Rnformation; 1995 Feb; 4(1):15. PubMed ID: 7651558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court rejects longstanding labor rule for nurses. NLRB v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America.
Mahoney ME
Health Care Superv; 1995 Jun; 13(4):13-7. PubMed ID: 10184342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nurses and the new NLRB rules. Implications for healthcare management.
Hepner JO; Zinner SE
Health Prog; 1991 Oct; 72(8):20-2. PubMed ID: 10112969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collective bargaining for nurses under the National Labor Relations Act. A look at the future.
Priest W
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):277-310. PubMed ID: 7636407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ANA, UAN fight to ensure workplace protection for RNs.
Smith WC; Martin S
Am J Nurs; 2002 Oct; 102(10):61-2. PubMed ID: 12394308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NLRB decisions favor the SNAs.
Ketter J
Nev Rnformation; 1995 Jun; 4(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 7566265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NLRB rules certain charge nurses 'supervisors'.
Am Nurse; 2006; 38(6):1, 5. PubMed ID: 17285710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court decision questions employment status of nurses.
N J Nurse; 1995; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 7731785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court backs providers.
Vaccaro PL; Bryant MR
Provider; 1994 Nov; 20(11):63-4. PubMed ID: 10138679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New management opportunities and the Kentucky River case.
Bernat RT
Physician Exec; 2001; 27(6):48-50. PubMed ID: 11769166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MN: NLRB orders "bargain with steel workers:" court remands case to NLRB on supervision issue.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Oct; 42(5):3. PubMed ID: 11998258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Supreme court vs nurses--an unacceptable decision.
Calfee BE
Revolution; 1994; 4(3):12-5, 17, 104. PubMed ID: 7788042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. Supreme Court affirms RNs belong in bargaining unit.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):1. PubMed ID: 11995397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who's the boss? High court ruling a setback for unionizing nurses.
Sherer JL
Hosp Health Netw; 1994 Jul; 68(14):56. PubMed ID: 8025606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Charge nurses at risk of losing collective bargaining rights.
Feammelli D
Oreg Nurse; 2006 Sep; 71(3):1, 6. PubMed ID: 16989173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
