251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8057655)
1. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration.
Kaufman Z; Shpitz B; Shapiro M; Rona R; Lew S; Dinbar A
J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 56(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 8057655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of combined clinical-mammographic-cytologic diagnosis of dominant breast masses. A prospective study.
Butler JA; Vargas HI; Worthen N; Wilson SE
Arch Surg; 1990 Jul; 125(7):893-5; discussion 896. PubMed ID: 2369314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.
Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA
Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
Hindle WH; Chen EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.
Ariga R; Bloom K; Reddy VB; Kluskens L; Francescatti D; Dowlat K; Siziopikou P; Gattuso P
Am J Surg; 2002 Nov; 184(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 12433603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the management of palpable benign and malignant breast disease. Correlation with clinical and mammographic findings.
Langmuir VK; Cramer SF; Hood ME
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 2916375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of persistent palpable dominant breast masses.
Hindle WH; Payne PA; Pan EY
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1814-8; discussion 1818-9. PubMed ID: 8317526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis and management of palpable breast mass.
Kanchanabat B; Kanchanapitak P; Thanapongsathorn W; Manomaiphiboon A
Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Nov; 70(11):791-4. PubMed ID: 11147439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: institutional experience].
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; Cortés-González R; Soto-Germes S; Ulloa JA; Uribe N
Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 16187698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.
Rubin M; Horiuchi K; Joy N; Haun W; Read R; Ratzer E; Fenoglio M
Am J Surg; 1997 Dec; 174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8. PubMed ID: 9409599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the assessment of highly suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: analysis of outcome for 182 lesions detected in the setting of a population-based breast cancer screening program.
Farshid G; Rush G
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):357-64. PubMed ID: 14681944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fine needle aspiration cytology, in relationships to clinical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of a solid breast mass.
Dixon JM; Anderson TJ; Lamb J; Nixon SJ; Forrest AP
Br J Surg; 1984 Aug; 71(8):593-6. PubMed ID: 6743977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome.
Zardawi IM; Hearnden F; Meyer P; Trevan B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10097704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate evaluation of palpable breast masses by the triple test score.
Morris A; Pommier RF; Schmidt WA; Shih RL; Alexander PW; Vetto JT
Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):930-4. PubMed ID: 9749842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of high frequency ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses in Chinese women: alternative to mammography?
Yang WT; Mok CO; King W; Tang A; Metreweli C
J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Sep; 15(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 8866446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonpalpable, well-defined, probably benign breast nodule: management by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and long-interval follow-up mammography.
Apesteguía L; Pina L; Inchusta M; Mellado M; Franquet T; De Miguel C; López-Cousillas A; Repáraz B
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 9377508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of the breast imaging reporting and data system final assessment system in sonography of palpable breast lesions and reconsideration of the modified triple test.
Kwak JY; Kim EK; Park HL; Kim JY; Oh KK
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Oct; 25(10):1255-61. PubMed ID: 16998097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic accuracy of palpation and fine-needle biopsy and an evaluation of their combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions: report on a prospective study in 1244 women with symptoms.
Rimsten A; Stenkvist B; Johanson H; Lindgren A
Ann Surg; 1975 Jul; 182(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 1170819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: initial experience in a tertiary-care institution.
Iles SE; MacGregor JH; Bodurtha AJ; Bernardo AI; Daniels C
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1994 Feb; 45(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 8118712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
