100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8057720)
1. [Contempt for midwives].
Maasing K
Lakartidningen; 1994 Jul; 91(30-31):2752. PubMed ID: 8057720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. General practitioner obstetrics.
Hoogerbrug M
N Z Med J; 1997 Apr; 110(1041):132. PubMed ID: 9140422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Selection guidelines for place of birth.
van Teijlingen E; Bryar R
Mod Midwife; 1996 Aug; 6(8):24-7. PubMed ID: 8974675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The antenatal care debate.
Baldo MH
East Mediterr Health J; 2001 Nov; 7(6):1046-55. PubMed ID: 15332747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A consensus document on maternity care. More evident distribution of responsibilities increases patient safety].
Lakartidningen; 1993 Sep; 90(35):2897-8. PubMed ID: 8377564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Vetting the doctor.
Dimond B
Mod Midwife; 1994 Sep; 4(9):21-2. PubMed ID: 7953813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Decentralized obstetrics and the fight between general practitioners and midwives].
Backe B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 May; 119(13):1936-8. PubMed ID: 10382346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Home care services in gynecology-obstetrics: administrative and economic problems].
Romanens C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(5):569-71. PubMed ID: 7983322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Family physician and maternity care: high tech or high touch?
Leeman L
Birth; 1995 Dec; 22(4):236. PubMed ID: 8573239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Alternatives to hospitalization in gynecology-obstetrics].
Ruf H; Olivier S; Guidicelli B; Rigal C; Gamerre M; Kasbarian M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(5):554-62. PubMed ID: 7983320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dilemma of rural obstetrics. One community's solution.
Osmun WE; Poenn D; Buie M
Can Fam Physician; 1997 Jun; 43():1115-9. PubMed ID: 9189300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Smooth access to competent health care following the family practice reform].
Wiborgh M
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jun; 99(25):2880. PubMed ID: 12143148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncaring midwives.
Eliasson M; Kainz G; von Post I
Nurs Ethics; 2008 Jul; 15(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 18515439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Family practice maternity care.
Hutten-Czapski P
Can Fam Physician; 1998 Apr; 44():707-8, 716-8. PubMed ID: 9585838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Midwives should not be overlooked in the creation of primary care groups.
Davis K
Nurs Times; 1998 Sep 9-15; 94(36):17. PubMed ID: 10026525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Propositions for a better practice. Point of view of a specialist].
Benbassa A
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 Mar; 26(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 9592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [No to the re-introduction of the crashed family practice reform--yes to a unison program].
Luhr M; Köhlin AL; Asplund C; Fritz T
Lakartidningen; 2003 Mar; 100(10):864-5. PubMed ID: 12680024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Management of pregnant women and newborns in low-risk pregnancies. Evaluation of the literature].
Blondel B; Grandjean H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Dec; 27(2 Suppl):8-20. PubMed ID: 10049027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternity care of low-risk women: identification of continuing education needs.
Pope R; Graham L
Pract Midwife; 1999; 2(7):30-4. PubMed ID: 10481689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prenatal care: a comparative evaluation of nurse-midwives and family physicians.
Lofsky S
CMAJ; 1989 Jan; 140(1):14. PubMed ID: 2909263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
