126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8058018)
1. Method of simulated screen sensitometry for asymmetric, low crossover medical x-ray films.
Dickerson RE; Haus AG; Baker CW
Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 8058018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Problems associated with simulated light sensitometry for low-crossover medical x-ray films.
Haus AG; Dickerson RE
Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 2215416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of light and x-ray sensitometric responses of double-emulsion films for different processing conditions.
Blendl C; Buhr E
Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2420-6. PubMed ID: 11797944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using light sensitometry to evaluate mammography film performance.
West MS; Spelic DC
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):854-60. PubMed ID: 10841387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Processor quality control in laser imaging systems.
Bogucki TM; Murphy WR; Baker CW; Piazza SS; Haus AG
Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):581-4. PubMed ID: 9127311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitometric responses of selected medical radiographic films.
Kofler JM; Gray JE
Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 1947114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified inverse square sensitometry for the determination of the characteristic curve of radiographic screen/film systems.
Yoshida A; Hiraki Y; Ohkawa Y; Yamada T; Hashimoto K; Aono K
Acta Med Okayama; 1986 Feb; 40(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3962729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of resolution and sensitometric characteristics of an asymmetric screen-film imaging system.
Gray JE; Stears JG; Swensen SJ; Bunch PC
Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 8327711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A time-scale sensitometric method for evaluating screen-film systems.
Góes EG; Pelá CA; Ghilardi NT
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Oct; 42(10):1939-46. PubMed ID: 9364589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A comparison of various methods of x-ray sensitometry].
Maslov LA; Gurvich AM; Chikirdin EG; Il'ina MA; Popova TA
Med Tekh; 1988; (5):36-41. PubMed ID: 3200152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film].
Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography film processor replenishment rate: bromide level monitoring.
Kimme-Smith C; Wuelfing P; Kitts EL; Cagnon C; Basic M; Bassett L
Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):369-72. PubMed ID: 9089588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A sensitometric comparison of Fuji Super HR-G and Kodak T-mat G panoramic films.
Benson BW; Frederiksen NL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 May; 79(5):646-8. PubMed ID: 7600231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective performance characteristics of a new asymmetric screen-film system.
Van Metter R; Dickerson R
Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1483-90. PubMed ID: 7838060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Secondary photon scatter in imaging cassettes.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1998 Sep; 21(3):101-11. PubMed ID: 9848944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
