These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8058018)

  • 21. Quality control in mammography.
    Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospects for x-ray exposure reduction using rare earth intensifying screens.
    Wagner RF; Weaver KE
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 1244656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a cassette-screen-film combination for radiation therapy portal localization imaging with improved contrast.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE; Huff KE; Monte S; Schlager BA; Atanas M; Matloubieh A
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1605-8. PubMed ID: 9350713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison and variations of the speed of radiographic film.
    Daniels C; Holloway AF
    Radiology; 1983 Jan; 146(1):203-7. PubMed ID: 6849046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
    Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The sensitometric recording of verification films in high-volt therapy].
    Proske H; Steinkamp P
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1992 Jan; 168(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 1734587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Dimakopoulou AD; Koulentianos ED; Serefoglou AN; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):666-71. PubMed ID: 15326045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Measures of screen-film performance.
    Haus AG
    Radiographics; 1996 Sep; 16(5):1165-81. PubMed ID: 8888396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relation between radiographic mottle for double and single emulsions.
    Arimura H; Okawa T; Okamoto M; Ikari T; Nakamori N; Kubota H; Matsumoto M; Takigawa A; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1625-35. PubMed ID: 9775367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Sensitometry of Mammographic Screen-film System Using Bootstrap Aluminum Step-Wedge.].
    Abe S; Imada R; Terauchi T; Fujisaki T; Monma M; Nishimura K; Saitoh H; Mochizuki Y
    Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 16479054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.
    Brink C; de Villiers JF; Lötter MG; van Zyl M
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):685-90. PubMed ID: 7719681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
    Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Normalized sensitometric curves for the verification of hybrid IMRT treatment plans with multiple energies.
    Georg D; Kroupa B; Winkler P; Pötter R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1142-50. PubMed ID: 12852539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Sensitometric characteristics of medical roentgenographic and fluorographic films. Sensitivity of the amplifying screens combined with a film].
    Gurvich AM; Erofeeva ND; Katomina RV; Maslov LA
    Med Tekh; 1976; (2):17-22. PubMed ID: 1030760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.