These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8058019)

  • 21. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.
    Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A spheroid positron emission tomograph for brain imaging: a feasibility study.
    Ficke DC; Hood JT; Ter-Pogossian MM
    J Nucl Med; 1996 Jul; 37(7):1219-25. PubMed ID: 8965202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new PET scanner with semiconductor detectors enables better identification of intratumoral inhomogeneity.
    Shiga T; Morimoto Y; Kubo N; Katoh N; Katoh C; Takeuchi W; Usui R; Hirata K; Kojima S; Umegaki K; Shirato H; Tamaki N
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 50(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 19091886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors].
    Lambruschi G; Tagliagambe A; Palla L; Torri T; D'Alessandro F; Pastori R; Barbieri L
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The potential role of positron emission mammography for detection of breast cancer. A phantom study.
    Raylman RR; Majewski S; Wojcik R; Weisenberger AG; Kross B; Popov V; Bishop HA
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 10984240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: I. Phosphor screens.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):877-89. PubMed ID: 7652013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry.
    Weinberg I; Majewski S; Weisenberger A; Markowitz A; Aloj L; Majewski L; Danforth D; Mulshine J; Cowan K; Zujewski J; Chow C; Jones E; Chang V; Berg W; Frank J
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1996 Jul; 23(7):804-6. PubMed ID: 8662120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monte Carlo simulation and experimental tests on BGO, CsF and NaI(Tl) crystals for positron emission tomography.
    Bottigli U; Guzzardi R; Mey M; Bellazzini R; Giannetti P; Giorgi MA; Massai MM; Tonelli G
    J Nucl Med Allied Sci; 1985; 29(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 3878395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo.
    Peplow DE; Verghese K
    Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 10757608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Monte Carlo study of the influence of focal spot size, intensity distribution, breast thickness and magnification on spatial resolution of an a-Se digital mammography system using the generalized MTF.
    Sakellaris T; Koutalonis M; Spyrou G; Pascoal A
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 24011672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
    Chen B; Ning R
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance study of the PC-384 positron camera system for emission tomography of the brain.
    Litton J; Bergström M; Eriksson L; Bohm C; Blomqvist G; Kesselberg M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1984 Feb; 8(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 6606656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Classification of compressed breast shapes for the design of equalization filters in x-ray mammography.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Liu B; Guru SV; Morton AR; Keshavmurthy S; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):937-48. PubMed ID: 9650184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experience with the EEC phantom and test procedures in two block detector scanners.
    Spinks TJ
    Med Prog Technol; 1991; 17(3-4):139-48. PubMed ID: 1839842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the performance characteristics of the PC 4600 positron emission tomograph.
    Kearfott KJ; Carroll LR
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1984 Jun; 8(3):502-13. PubMed ID: 6609941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.