These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8058242)
1. Assessment of fetal well-being using the nonstress test in the home setting. Naef RW; Morrison JC; Washburne JF; McLaughlin BN; Perry KG; Roberts WE Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):424-6. PubMed ID: 8058242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of the contraction stress and nonstress tests in the management of post-term pregnancy. Druzin ML; Karver ML; Wagner W; Hutson JM; Waltner A; Kogut E Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Jun; 174(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 1595028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests? Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The nonreactive nonstress test: predictive value for neonatal anemia in the isoimmunized pregnancy. Ouzounian JG; Alsulyman OM; Monteiro HA; Songster GS Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):364-7. PubMed ID: 8752240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health. Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Wong YC; Ratnam SS Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical application of the expert type terminal of remote electronic fetal heart rate home monitoring system]. Su F; Guo X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 12411023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of nonstressed fetal heart rate with sequential contraction stress test. Gibbons JM; Nagle P Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 55(5):612-6. PubMed ID: 7366920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Smith CV; Phelan JP; Nguyen HN; Jacobs N; Paul RH J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An active management approach to the postdate fetus with a reactive nonstress test and fetal heart rate decelerations. Small ML; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Paul RH Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 3627631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal heart rate monitoring at home and transmission by telephone. Gonen R; Braithwaite N; Milligan JE Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):464-8. PubMed ID: 2304718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial. Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test. Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The startle test revisited. Miller JM; Rodriguez A; Gabert HA J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 24(7):421-2. PubMed ID: 15152272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing. Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone]. Pan J; Ye M; Du X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]