These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8058242)

  • 41. Acute effect of cigarette smoking on the fetal heart nonstress test.
    Barrett JM; Vanhooydonk JE; Boehm FH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Apr; 57(4):422-5. PubMed ID: 7243086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical implications of prospective antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Devoe LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(8):983-90. PubMed ID: 7405996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Choice of antenatal testing significantly effects a patient's work obligations.
    Denney JM; Waters TP; Gorman R; Pollock M; Sciscione AC
    J Perinatol; 2008 Feb; 28(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18046339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factors that increase reactivity during fetal nonstress testing.
    Esin S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24614020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A controlled trial of self-nonstress test versus assisted nonstress test in the evaluation of fetal well-being.
    Reece EA; Hagay Z; Garofalo J; Hobbins JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 166(2):489-92. PubMed ID: 1536216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of auditory versus electronic assessment of antenatal fetal welfare.
    O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 7393517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Telemedicine for antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies with ambulatory and home fetal heart rate monitoring--an update.
    Hod M; Kerner R
    J Perinat Med; 2003; 31(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 12825474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contraction stress test by intermittent nipple stimulation.
    Huddleston JF; Sutliff G; Robinson D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 6717870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie TA; de Jager M; da Ponte A
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations. An alternative to the nonstress test.
    Daniels SM; Boehm N
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 2037878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The nonstress test. Criteria for the duration of fetal heart rate acceleration.
    Willis DC; Blanco JD; Hamblen KA; Stovall DW
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Sep; 35(9):901-3. PubMed ID: 2231567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reliability of antenatal testing: estriol levels versus nonstress testing.
    Lauersen NH; Kurkulos M; Graves ZR; Lewin K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6856212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I. Evolution of the nonstress test.
    Evertson LR; Gauthier RJ; Schifrin BS; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jan; 133(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 760532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of halogen light in fetal stimulation for fetal well-being assessment.
    Thanaboonyawat I; Wataganara T; Boriboonhiransarn D; Viboonchart S; Tontisirin P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1376-80. PubMed ID: 17100372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The application of multiple-parameter scoring to antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Devoe LD; Yanowitch G; Azor H
    J Reprod Med; 1981 May; 26(5):250-4. PubMed ID: 7252938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Semi-Fowler's positioning, lateral tilts, and their effects on nonstress tests.
    Moffatt FW; van den Hof M
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1997; 26(5):551-7. PubMed ID: 9313185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A prospective comparative study of the extended nonstress test and the nipple stimulation contraction stress test.
    Devoe LD; Morrison J; Martin J; Palmer S; Martin R; Searle N; Arthur M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 157(3):531-7. PubMed ID: 3631154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The evaluation of antepartum fetal well-being using the nonstress test.
    Paul RH
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 6749370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Population differences affect nonstress test reactivity.
    Paine LL; Strobino DM; Witter FR; Johnson TR
    J Perinatol; 1991 Mar; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2037889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F; Martínez JM; Puerto B; Coll O; Cararach V; Vanrell JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.