These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8058708)
1. Comparison of flow cytometric DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded solid neoplasms. Kumar D; Kumar S; Lyon D Mod Pathol; 1994 Apr; 7(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 8058708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma. Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of ulcerative colitis using paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens: comparison with morphology and DNA analysis of fresh samples. Hartmann DP; Montgomery EA; Carr NJ; Gupta PK; Azumi N Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 Apr; 90(4):590-6. PubMed ID: 7717317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flow cytometric nuclear DNA content of fresh and paraffin-embedded tissues of breast carcinomas and fibroadenomas. De Vita R; Calugi A; Eleuteri P; Maggi O; Nassuato C; Vecchione A Eur J Basic Appl Histochem; 1991; 35(3):233-44. PubMed ID: 1718443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [DNA flow cytometry. Comparison of the methods for nuclear extraction from frozen and paraffin-embedded sections]. Cornacchiari A; Grigolato PG; Cadei M; Alpi F; Chirico E; Cominotti A; Facchetti F Pathologica; 1997 Apr; 89(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 9411358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of proliferation activity in breast carcinoma by flow cytometry analysis of S-phase and quantitative analysis of MIB-1. Masood S; Bui MM; Lu L Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 9846198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Correlation of DNA index and S-phase fraction with histopathologic grade and clinical outcome. Demirel D; Laucirica R; Fishman A; Owens RG; Grey MM; Kaplan AL; Ramzy I Cancer; 1996 Apr; 77(8):1494-500. PubMed ID: 8608534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation. Danque PO; Chen HB; Patil J; Jagirdar J; Orsatti G; Paronetto F Mod Pathol; 1993 May; 6(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 8346174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow cytometric and clinicopathologic study of complete hydatidiform moles with special reference to the significance of cytometric aneuploidy. Fukunaga M Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Apr; 81(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 11277652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of five cell cycle analysis models applied to 1414 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast cancer. Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 9056743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a modeling system for S-phase estimation in breast cancer by flow cytometry. Dressler LG; Seamer L; Owens MA; Clark GM; McGuire WL Cancer Res; 1987 Oct; 47(20):5294-302. PubMed ID: 3652035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma. Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of model chromosome number of cultured non-small cell lung carcinomas with DNA index of solid tumor tissue. Siegfried JM; Ellison DJ; Resau JH; Miura I; Testa JR Cancer Res; 1991 Jun; 51(12):3267-73. PubMed ID: 1645617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of image analysis of imprints with flow cytometry for DNA analysis of solid tumors. Claud RD; Weinstein RS; Howeedy A; Straus AK; Coon JS Mod Pathol; 1989 Sep; 2(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 2813345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Variation of the diploid pattern in tissues used as normal controls of solid tumors: advantages and disadvantages of flow cytometric analysis of paraffin-embedded tissues]. Kawaguchi F; Shimokawa K; Ikeda T; Inada K Rev Med Chil; 1993 Jul; 121(7):738-45. PubMed ID: 8296076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA ploidy and proliferation heterogeneity in human prostate cancers. Shankey TV; Jin JK; Dougherty S; Flanigan RC; Graham S; Pyle JM Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 21(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 8529468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow cytometric analysis of DNA in cells obtained from deparaffinized formalin-fixed lymphoid tissues. McIntire TL; Goldey SH; Benson NA; Braylan RC Cytometry; 1987 Sep; 8(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 3665672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prognostic factors in neuroblastoma. Usefulness of DNA analysis using flow cytometry on paraffin-embedded material]. Massara FM; Tonello M; Forni M; Fruttero A; Lantermo R; Pugno F; Cordero di Montezemolo L; Ruà S Pediatr Med Chir; 1996; 18(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 8767575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of DNA content and proliferative activity with clinical outcome in patients with diffuse mixed cell and large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Wooldridge TN; Grierson HL; Weisenburger DD; Armitage JO; Sanger WG; Collins MM; Pierson JL; Pauza ME; Fordyce R; Purtilo DT Cancer Res; 1988 Nov; 48(22):6608-13. PubMed ID: 3052808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA quantification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus by flow cytometry and cytophotometric image analysis using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue. Dorman AM; Walsh TN; Droogan O; Curran B; Hourihane DO; Hennessy TP; Leader M Cytometry; 1992; 13(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 1459005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]