BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8058900)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8058900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of a self-adhesive resin luting system on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns.
    Burke FJ; Fleming GJ; Abbas G; Richter B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Dec; 14(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 17205955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents.
    Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Katoh Y
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):767-71. PubMed ID: 7568681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams.
    Boyer DB; Roth L
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indirect composite preparation width and depth and tooth fracture resistance.
    Watts DC; Wilson NH; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 1995 Feb; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7546466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
    Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
    de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with different filling techniques.
    França FM; Worschech CC; Paulillo LA; Martins LR; Lovadino JR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Aug; 6(3):62-9. PubMed ID: 16127473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.