241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8058900)
21. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage.
Coelho-De-Souza FH; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 18335731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration.
Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Compressive strength recovery by composite onlays in primary teeth. Substrate treatment and luting agent effects.
Borges AF; Correr GM; Sinhoreti MA; Consani S; Sobrinho LC; Rontani RM
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):478-84. PubMed ID: 16427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems.
Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M
Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture strength of restored premolars.
Camacho GB; Gonçalves M; Nonaka T; Osório AB
Am J Dent; 2007 Apr; 20(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 17542207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
Kivanç BH; Görgül G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):33-40. PubMed ID: 18997914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retention strength of tin plated gold inlays bonded with two resin cements.
Eakle WS; Giblin JM
Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 11199614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
Sagsen B; Aslan B
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin.
Trope M; Tronstad L
J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 1940749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of restorative materials on cuspal flexure.
Medige J; Deng Y; Yu X; Davis EL; Joynt RB
Quintessence Int; 1995 Aug; 26(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 8602435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
