These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8059748)

  • 1. The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Tselepis M; Brockhurst P; West VC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 8059748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
    Vaughan JL; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
    Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J; Jones S
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
    Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.
    Monteiro MR; Silva LE; Elias CN; Vilella Ode V
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires.
    Prososki RR; Bagby MD; Erickson LC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 1927985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS; Kim CW
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 15673146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets.
    Pizzoni L; Ravnholt G; Melsen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 9699406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the frictional characteristics of five initial alignment wires and stainless steel brackets at three bracket to wire angulations--an in vitro study.
    Dickson JA; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 21(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8199160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
    Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
    Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.