These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8059817)

  • 1. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group.
    Crane JP; LeFevre ML; Winborn RC; Evans JK; Ewigman BG; Bain RP; Frigoletto FD; McNellis D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):392-9. PubMed ID: 8059817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal anomaly detection by second-trimester ultrasonography in a tertiary center.
    VanDorsten JP; Hulsey TC; Newman RB; Menard MK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 178(4):742-9. PubMed ID: 9579436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prenatal sonography for the detection of fetal anomalies: results of a prospective study and comparison with prior series.
    Anderson N; Boswell O; Duff G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):943-50. PubMed ID: 7676997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Twin pregnancies in the second trimester in women in an alpha-fetoprotein screening program: sonographic evaluation and outcome.
    Pretorius DH; Budorick NE; Scioscia AL; Krabbe JK; Ko S; Myhre CM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 7506005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting fetal anomalies and perinatal outcome of anomalous fetuses.
    Lee K; Kim SY; Choi SM; Kim JS; Lee BS; Seo K; Lee YH; Kim DK
    Yonsei Med J; 1998 Aug; 39(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 9752805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of follow-up standard sonography for fetal anomaly detection.
    Byrne JJ; Morgan JL; Twickler DM; McIntire DD; Dashe JS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):615.e1-615.e9. PubMed ID: 31930994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.
    Ewigman BG; Crane JP; Frigoletto FD; LeFevre ML; Bain RP; McNellis D
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(12):821-7. PubMed ID: 8355740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal anomalies in a controlled one-stage ultrasound screening trial. A report from the Helsinki Ultrasound Trial.
    Saari-Kemppainen A; Karjalainen O; Ylöstalo P; Heinonen OP
    J Perinat Med; 1994; 22(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 7877064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Routine ultrasound screening in diabetic pregnancies.
    Wong SF; Chan FY; Cincotta RB; Oats JJ; McIntyre HD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 19(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 11876810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on maternal management and outcome. RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) Study Group.
    LeFevre ML; Bain RP; Ewigman BG; Frigoletto FD; Crane JP; McNellis D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 169(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 8372849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy.
    Taipale P; Ammälä M; Salonen R; Hiilesmaa V
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 101(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12576250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accurate detection of anomalies by routine ultrasonography in an indigent clinic population.
    Magriples U; Copel JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):978-81. PubMed ID: 9790383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second trimester routine ultrasound and abnormal findings.
    Eurenius K; Axelsson O; Eriksson L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Mar; 75(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 8607335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary maternal cytomegalovirus infections: accuracy of fetal ultrasound for predicting sequelae in offspring.
    Leyder M; Vorsselmans A; Done E; Van Berkel K; Faron G; Foulon I; Naessens A; Jansen A; Foulon W; Gucciardo L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):638.e1-638.e8. PubMed ID: 27287685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenatal diagnosis of severe structural congenital malformations in Europe.
    Garne E; Loane M; Dolk H; De Vigan C; Scarano G; Tucker D; Stoll C; Gener B; Pierini A; Nelen V; Rösch C; Gillerot Y; Feijoo M; Tincheva R; Queisser-Luft A; Addor MC; Mosquera C; Gatt M; Barisic I
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 25(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15619321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia.
    Colvin J; Bower C; Dickinson JE; Sokol J
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):e356-63. PubMed ID: 16140678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of mid-trimester routine ultrasonographic screening in antenatal detection of congenital malformations.
    Pitukkijronnakorn S; Chittacharoen A; Jetsawangsri T; Panburana P; Jaovisidha A; Roungsipragarn R; Saropala N; Herabutya Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 19530579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transvaginal ultrasonography at early pregnancy cannot be used alone for targeted organ ultrasonographic examination in a high-risk population.
    Yagel S; Achiron R; Ron M; Revel A; Anteby E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 172(3):971-5. PubMed ID: 7892892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Outcome of fetuses with malformations discovered before 14 weeks. Where the discovery is revealed by echography during the first trimester, is it responsible for the voluntary termination of the pregnancy? Comparison before and after July 2001].
    Mangione R; Fries N; Godard P; Fontanges M; Haddad G; Mirlesse V;
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Apr; 37(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 18036748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of routine obstetric ultrasonographic screening in a low-risk population.
    Skupski DW; Newman S; Edersheim T; Hutson JM; Udom-Rice I; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1142-5. PubMed ID: 8942479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.