205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8060017)
1. Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique.
Wood DP; Elliott RW
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 8060017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
Cordray FE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the mandibular position in malocclusion patients.
He H; Fu M
Chin J Dent Res; 2000 May; 3(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11314339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records.
Karl PJ; Foley TF
Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):117-24; discussion 124-5. PubMed ID: 10227551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analysis of mandibular position of patients with angles Class I and Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
He H; Fu M
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 36(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 11769653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimated and true hinge axis: a comparison of condylar displacements.
Wood DP; Korne PH
Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):167-75; discussion 176. PubMed ID: 1416235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems.
Hicks ST; Wood DP
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 8863965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
Crawford SD
Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):103-15; discussion 115-6. PubMed ID: 10227550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of different registration techniques on condyle displacement and electromyographic activity in stomatognathically healthy subjects: a prospective study.
Linsen SS; Stark H; Samai A
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jan; 107(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 22230915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Movement between centric relation contact position and the intercuspal position.
Wise MD
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 1520455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques.
Keshvad A; Winstanley RB
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):90-101. PubMed ID: 12964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of condylar position in symptomatic (TMJ dysfunction) and asymptomatic individuals.
Padala S; Padmanabhan S; Chithranjan AB
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):122. PubMed ID: 22842268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy in adult angle's class II pretreatment patients].
Deng X; Wan Z; He SS; Wamalwa P; Chen S; Zhang ZY
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 29(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 21427900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reproducibility of centric relation of the patient with severe dental attrition for oral rehabilitation].
Kang H; Chao Y; Yi X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Dec; 21(6):457-9. PubMed ID: 14732981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of the anterior functional device in recording the centric relations of patients with posterior tooth loss.
Ballastreire MC; Carmo GG; Fantini SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 26119015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position.
Utz KH; Müller F; Lückerath W; Fuss E; Koeck B
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 May; 29(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12028494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
Goyal MK; Goyal S
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The difference in condylar position between centric relation and centric occlusion in pretreatment Japanese orthodontic patients.
Hidaka O; Adachi S; Takada K
Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 12169028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.
Shildkraut M; Wood DP; Hunter WS
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7794320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular condyle position: comparison of articulator mountings and magnetic resonance imaging.
Alexander SR; Moore RN; DuBois LM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 8362784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
