198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8060891)
1. Flow cytometric detection of chromosome abnormalities by measuring centromeric index, DNA content, and DNA base composition.
Rens W; Boschman GA; Hoovers JM; Manders EM; Slater RM; Stap J; Aten JA
Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 May; 6(4):359-75. PubMed ID: 8060891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semi-automated detection of aberrant chromosomes in bivariate flow karyotypes.
Boschman GA; Manders EM; Rens W; Slater R; Aten JA
Cytometry; 1992; 13(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 1633726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of the DNA content of structurally abnormal X chromosomes and X chromosome aneuploidy using high resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.
Trask B; van den Engh G; Nussbaum R; Schwartz C; Gray J
Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 2106419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Centromeric index versus DNA content flow karyotypes of human chromosomes measured by means of slit-scan flow cytometry.
Lucas JN; Gray JW
Cytometry; 1987 May; 8(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 3595351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bivariate flow karyotyping of human chromosomes: evaluation of variation in Hoechst 33258 fluorescence, chromomycin A3 fluorescence, and relative chromosomal DNA content.
Boschman GA; Rens W; van Oven CH; Manders EM; Aten JA
Cytometry; 1991; 12(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 1722448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytogenetic and corresponding flow cytometric DNA analysis of renal cell neoplasms.
el-Naggar AK; Pathak S
Anticancer Res; 1992; 12(5):1491-500. PubMed ID: 1444211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of numerical chromosome aberrations in bladder cancer by in situ hybridization.
Hopman AH; Poddighe PJ; Smeets AW; Moesker O; Beck JL; Vooijs GP; Ramaekers FC
Am J Pathol; 1989 Dec; 135(6):1105-17. PubMed ID: 2688431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The relationships among DNA ploidy type determined by laser scanning cytometry, the overexpression of p53 protein and the numerical aberrations of chromosome 7 in bladder cancer].
Kawamura K; Ikeda R; Suzuki K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2000 Jun; 46(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 10934605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of chromosome numerical changes in multiple myeloma: fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using 15 chromosome-specific probes.
Tabernero D; San Miguel JF; Garcia-Sanz M; Nájera L; García-Isidoro M; Peréz-Simon JA; Gonzalez M; Wiegant J; Raap AK; Orfão A
Am J Pathol; 1996 Jul; 149(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 8686739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Flow cytogenetics. Principles, advantages and limitations. What trends for onco-hematology?].
Métézeau P
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Jan; 36(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 3283671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The DNA-based human karyotype.
Mayall BH; Carrano AV; Moore DH; Ashworth LK; Bennett DE; Mendelsohn ML
Cytometry; 1984 Jul; 5(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 6205836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Slit-scanning technique using standard cell sorter instruments for analyzing and sorting nonacrocentric human chromosomes, including small ones.
Rens W; Van Oven CH; Stap J; Jakobs ME; Aten JA
Cytometry; 1994 May; 16(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 8033738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA flow cytometric analysis and numerical chromosome 9 aberrations detected by interphase cytogenetics in superficial bladder TCC.
Eleuteri P; Grollino MG; Pomponi D; Calugi G; Rocchi M; De Vita R
Eur J Histochem; 1997; 41 Suppl 2():161-2. PubMed ID: 9859830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of bivariate flow karyotypes.
Dean PN; Kolla S; Van Dilla MA
Cytometry; 1989 Mar; 10(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 2469555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of cytogenetic abnormalities and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy of benign, borderline malignant, and different grades of malignant soft tissue tumors.
Van den Berg E; Van Oven MW; de Jong B; Dam A; Wiersema J; Dijkhuizen T; Hoekstra HJ; Molenaar WM
Lab Invest; 1994 Mar; 70(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 8145525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generation of five high-complexity painting probe libraries from flow-sorted mouse chromosomes.
Weier HU; Polikoff D; Fawcett JJ; Greulich KM; Lee KH; Cram S; Chapman VM; Gray JW
Genomics; 1994 Jun; 21(3):641-4. PubMed ID: 7959744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preparation and bivariate analysis of suspensions of human chromosomes.
van den Engh GJ; Trask BJ; Gray JW; Langlois RG; Yu LC
Cytometry; 1985 Mar; 6(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 2579781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of inverted duplicated #15 chromosomes using bivariate flow cytometric analysis.
Lalande M; Schreck RR; Hoffman R; Latt SA
Cytometry; 1985 Jan; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2578344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A comparative study of DNA measurement of bladder cancer from image cytometry and chromosome aberration in in situ hybridization].
Nemoto R; Nakamura I; Uchida K; Harada M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1995 Jun; 22 Suppl 2():153-7. PubMed ID: 7611780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunofluorescent labeling of centromeres for flow cytometric analysis.
Schmitz A; Guilly MN; Trask B; van den Engh G
Cytometry; 1992; 13(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 1378781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
