167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8061995)
41. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Anteroposterior and lateral spinal DXA for the assessment of vertebral body strength: comparison with hip and forearm measurement.
Bjarnason K; Hassager C; Svendsen OL; Stang H; Christiansen C
Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8845598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Effect of the Lumbar Vertebral Malpositioning on Bone Mineral Density Measurements of the Lumbar Spine by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Izadyar S; Golbarg S; Takavar A; Zakariaee SS
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 26778450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of region of interest selection on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the calcaneus in 55 post-menopausal women.
Kang C; Speller R
Br J Radiol; 1999 Sep; 72(861):864-71. PubMed ID: 10645192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. DEXA measurement of spine density in the lateral projection. I: Methodology.
Mazess RB; Gifford CA; Bisek JP; Barden HS; Hanson JA
Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Oct; 49(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 1760765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Bone mass assessment in rats by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Gala Paniagua J; Díaz-Curiel M; de la Piedra Gordo C; Castilla Reparaz C; Torralbo García M
Br J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 71(847):754-8. PubMed ID: 9771386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Bone Mineral Density Precision for Individual and Combined Vertebrae Configurations From Lumbar Spine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scans.
Hind K; Oldroyd B
J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(4):673-677. PubMed ID: 31036447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Total body, spine, and femur dual X-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.
Nuti R; Martini G; Gennari C
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Dec; 53(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 8293352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Frame size, ethnicity, lifestyle, and biologic contributors to areal and volumetric lumbar spine bone mineral density in Indian/Pakistani and American Caucasian premenopausal women.
Alekel DL; Peterson CT; Werner RK; Mortillaro E; Ahmed N; Kukreja SC
J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 12110761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry: reference data for vertebral dimensions.
Rea JA; Steiger P; Blake GM; Potts E; Smith IG; Fogelman I
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Mar; 13(3):464-74. PubMed ID: 9525347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Identification of rheumatoid arthritis patients with vertebral fractures using bone mineral density and trabecular bone score.
Bréban S; Briot K; Kolta S; Paternotte S; Ghazi M; Fechtenbaum J; Roux C
J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 22445857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: an in vitro study.
Tabensky AD; Williams J; DeLuca V; Briganti E; Seeman E
J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1981-8. PubMed ID: 8970902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A hierarchical 3D segmentation method and the definition of vertebral body coordinate systems for QCT of the lumbar spine.
Mastmeyer A; Engelke K; Fuchs C; Kalender WA
Med Image Anal; 2006 Aug; 10(4):560-77. PubMed ID: 16828329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patient variables impact lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry precision.
Blank RD; Malone DG; Christian RC; Vallarta-Ast NL; Krueger DC; Drezner MK; Binkley NC; Hansen KE
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 16435075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Influence of osteophytic size on bone mineral density measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Rand T; Schneider B; Grampp S; Wunderbaldinger P; Migsits H; Imhof H
Acta Radiol; 1997 Mar; 38(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9093153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Calcaneus as a site for assessment of bone mineral density: evaluation in cadavers and healthy volunteers.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 8352120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Enhanced Precision of the New Hologic Horizon Model Compared With the Old Discovery Model Is Less Evident When Fewer Vertebrae Are Included in the Analysis.
McNamara EA; Kilim HP; Malabanan AO; Whittaker LG; Rosen HN
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 27422238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of lumbar spine bone mineral density in the anteroposterior and lateral projections by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Sapkas GS; Papagelopoulos PJ; Stathakopoulos DP; Papadakis SA; Kiratzoulis JM; Stilianessi E
Orthopedics; 2001 Oct; 24(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 11688774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Vertebral measurements for assessment of osteoporosis.
Ito M; Hayashi K; Yamada M; Nakamura T
Br J Radiol; 1994 Aug; 67(800):759-63. PubMed ID: 8087480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
