These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8062129)
1. Controversy over ionic and nonionic radiopaque contrast media. Hamilton G Can Assoc Radiol J; 1994 Aug; 45(4):331. PubMed ID: 8062129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Contamination of contrast agent by MBT in rubber seals. Hamilton G CMAJ; 1987 May; 136(10):1020-1. PubMed ID: 3567758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ionic versus nonionic contrast agents for intravenous use: are all the answers in? Bettmann MA Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):616-8. PubMed ID: 2343105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction after infusion of nonionic intravenous contrast material for an excretory urogram: a case report and review of the literature. Stovsky MD; Seftel AD; Resnick MI J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1641-3. PubMed ID: 7714996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of severe adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in Japan: evaluation of pretesting. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Yamaguchi K; Katayama H; Takashima T; Kozuka T; Seez P; Matsuura K Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 1987594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The adverse effects of angiographic radiocontrast media. Westhoff-Bleck M; Bleck JS; Jost S Drug Saf; 1991; 6(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 2029351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Current problems with delayed reactions to intravascular administration of nonionic contrast media]. Beyer-Enke SA Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):330-3. PubMed ID: 9081406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Leaching of a contaminant into the contents of disposable syringes. Petersen MC; Vine JH; Ashley JJ; Nation RL Aust N Z J Med; 1981 Apr; 11(2):208-9. PubMed ID: 6944048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. II. Clinical considerations. Dawson P; Cousins C; Bradshaw A Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S31-6; discussion S37-8. PubMed ID: 8282500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Present concepts on hypersensitivity to iodine contrast media]. Milosević D; Stanojević V; Mihajlović M; Jovanić D Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1982 Oct; 110(10):1223-31. PubMed ID: 7182933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. Cochran ST; Bomyea K; Sayre JW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1385-8. PubMed ID: 11373197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Possible role of contaminating endotoxin in radiographic contrast media reactions. Fumarola D; Brandonisio O; Monno R; Miragliotta G; De Serio N Ann Sclavo; 1978; 20(5):781-5. PubMed ID: 753140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Miscellaneous adverse effects of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media: a study revised. Brismar J; Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1826061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]