These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8063246)
1. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Andersen ES; Pedersen B; Nielsen K Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8063246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study. Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses. Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens. An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement. Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its association with high-grade histopathological recurrence after cervical excision in women with negative excision margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Tzavara C Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 309(3):939-948. PubMed ID: 37821642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins. Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study. Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions. Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia. Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization. Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy. Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III. Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laser conization assisted by crypt visualization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Bandieramonte G; Lomonico S; Quattrone P; Stefanon B; Merola M; Bucci A Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 91(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 9469287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study. Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Morphological observation of cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Chen XD; Shi HY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 43(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 19035137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]