These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers. Paton CD; Hopkins WG Int J Sports Med; 2006 Jun; 27(6):444-7. PubMed ID: 16767608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physiologic and perceptual responses to exercise on a new cycle ergometer. Attaway R; Bartoli WP; Pate RR; Davis JM Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Mar; 17(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 1322770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of the Velotron ergometer and SRM power meter. Abbiss CR; Quod MJ; Levin G; Martin DT; Laursen PB Int J Sports Med; 2009 Feb; 30(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19177315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of aerobic work and power on a rope-braked cycle ergometer by direct measurement. Gordon RS; Franklin KL; Baker JS; Davies B Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2006 Aug; 31(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 16900228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correcting the Wingate test for changes in kinetic energy of the ergometer flywheel. Bassett DR Int J Sports Med; 1989 Dec; 10(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 2628365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of a combined 3-min constant load and performance cycling test. Doherty M; Balmer J; Davison RC; Robinson L; Smith PM Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jul; 24(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 12868049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanics of a rope-braked cycle ergometer flywheel and its use for physiological measurement. Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Baker JS; Davies B Res Sports Med; 2005; 13(4):331-44. PubMed ID: 16440507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The validity and reliability of a sample of 10 Wattbike cycle ergometers. Wainwright B; Cooke CB; O'Hara JP J Sports Sci; 2017 Jul; 35(14):1451-1458. PubMed ID: 27552233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of treadmill and cycle ergometer measurements of force-velocity relationships and power output. Jaskólska A; Goossens P; Veenstra B; Jaskólski A; Skinner JS Int J Sports Med; 1999 Apr; 20(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 10333097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tests of cycling performance. Paton CD; Hopkins WG Sports Med; 2001; 31(7):489-96. PubMed ID: 11428686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship of high intensity cycle ergometry. McNaughton L; Thomas D Int J Sports Med; 1996 May; 17(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8814511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The comparison of physiological responses from cycling on friction-braked and electromagnetic ergometers. Seifert JG Res Q Exerc Sport; 1991 Mar; 62(1):115-7. PubMed ID: 2028087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and Validity of Commercially Available Kayak Ergometers. Borges TO; Bullock N; Aitken D; Coutts AJ Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2017 Oct; 12(9):1267-1270. PubMed ID: 28182506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]