These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8063472)

  • 1. Good subjective presbyopic correction with newly designed aspheric multifocal contact lens.
    Zandvoort SW; Kok JH; Molenaar H
    Int Ophthalmol; 1993-1994; 17(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 8063472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of an innovative back surface multifocal contact lens in correcting presbyopia.
    Woods C; Ruston D; Hough T; Efron N
    CLAO J; 1999 Jul; 25(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10444055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new method to analyse the effect of multifocal contact lenses on visual function.
    Sanchez I; Ortiz-Toquero S; Blanco M; Martin R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Apr; 41(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 29217455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of four multifocal contact lenses in young monocular aphakic patients.
    Conklin JD; Litteral G; Schmeisser ET; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Apr; 18(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 1606680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An objective and subjective comparative analysis of diffractive and front surface aspheric contact lens designs used to correct presbyopia.
    Brenner MB
    CLAO J; 1994 Jan; 20(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8149568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective and subjective assessment of a new diffractive trifocal contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Belkin M
    Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol (1985); 1996-1997; 19-20():41-4. PubMed ID: 11548785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):322-30. PubMed ID: 27237964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual quality assessment and comparison of two multifocal scleral lens designs.
    Privado-Aroco A; Romaguera M; Valdes-Soria G; Serramito M; Carracedo G
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2024 Feb; 47(1):102098. PubMed ID: 38040556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodative functions with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Montés-Micó R; Madrid-Costa D; Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):998-1004. PubMed ID: 21552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Contact Lens Design on Objective Visual Acuity-Based Parameters in Pre-Presbyopic Patients in Photopic and Mesopic Lighting Conditions.
    Sztrigler-Cohen O; Bromberger N; Thee Y; Lender R; Ben-Eli H
    Vision (Basel); 2023 Jun; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 37368819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual function through 4 contact lens-based pinhole systems for presbyopia.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Cerviño A; Charman WN; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 22424803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes.
    Fedtke C; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Chung J; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Feb; 39(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26228543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Llorente-Guillemot A; García-Lazaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Perez-Cambrodi RJ; Cerviño A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Jan; 95(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 22070196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.