These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8064247)

  • 41. The effect of presentation paradigm on syntactic processing: An event-related fMRI study.
    Lee D; Newman SD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 19554559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Morphological agreement at a distance: dissociation between early and late components of the event-related brain potential.
    O'Rourke PL; Van Petten C
    Brain Res; 2011 May; 1392():62-79. PubMed ID: 21466794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation.
    Hagoort P; Brown CM
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(11):1531-49. PubMed ID: 10906378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order?
    Casado P; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Fernández-Frías C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):526-43. PubMed ID: 16099364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Is the P600/SPS affected by the richness of semantic content? A linguistic ERP study in Swedish.
    Ericsson E; Olofsson JK; Nordin S; Rudolfsson T; Sandström G
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18190397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: an event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance.
    Alemán Bañón J; Fiorentino R; Gabriele A
    Brain Res; 2012 May; 1456():49-63. PubMed ID: 22520436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2021 Aug; 24(4):612-627. PubMed ID: 35669170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15968918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Semantic memory and verbal working memory correlates of N400 to subordinate homographs.
    Salisbury DF
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 15177821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences.
    Malaia E; Wilbur RB; Weber-Fox C
    Brain Lang; 2009 Mar; 108(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 18945484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Modulation of semantic integration as a function of syntactic expectations: event-related brain potential evidence.
    Isel F; Shen W
    Neuroreport; 2011 Mar; 22(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 21358555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift.
    Münte TF; Heinze HJ; Matzke M; Wieringa BM; Johannes S
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Mar; 36(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 9622187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Grammatical processing without semantics? An event-related brain potential study of preschoolers using jabberwocky sentences.
    Silva-Pereyra J; Conboy BT; Klarman L; Kuhl PK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):1050-65. PubMed ID: 17536974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Melodic pitch expectation interacts with neural responses to syntactic but not semantic violations.
    Carrus E; Pearce MT; Bhattacharya J
    Cortex; 2013 Sep; 49(8):2186-200. PubMed ID: 23141867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Martín-Loeches M; Fernández A; Schacht A; Sommer W; Casado P; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3262-72. PubMed ID: 22982604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing.
    Gunter TC; Friederici AD
    Psychophysiology; 1999 Jan; 36(1):126-37. PubMed ID: 10098388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Multiple semantic processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy: does the higher-level process proceed in face of a lower-level failure?
    Jiang X; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1918-28. PubMed ID: 22561886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials.
    Friederici AD; Mecklinger A; Spencer KM; Steinhauer K; Donchin E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 11(2):305-23. PubMed ID: 11275491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Local and global semantic integration in an argument structure: ERP evidence from Korean.
    Nam Y; Hong U
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1642():590-602. PubMed ID: 27095512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.