BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8064589)

  • 1. The Influence of Filler Particles on the Mechanical Properties of Maxillofacial Prosthetic Silicone Elastomers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Barman A; Rashid F; Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Dudley J; Yhaya MFB; Alam MK
    Polymers (Basel); 2020 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 32664615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemically defined, ultrasoft PDMS elastomers with selectable elasticity for mechanobiology.
    Heinrichs V; Dieluweit S; Stellbrink J; Pyckhout-Hintzen W; Hersch N; Richter D; Merkel R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195180. PubMed ID: 29624610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanically and biologically skin-like elastomers for bio-integrated electronics.
    Chen S; Sun L; Zhou X; Guo Y; Song J; Qian S; Liu Z; Guan Q; Meade Jeffries E; Liu W; Wang Y; He C; You Z
    Nat Commun; 2020 Feb; 11(1):1107. PubMed ID: 32107380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supporting data for impact of filler composition on mechanical and dynamic response of 3-D printed silicone-based nanocomposite elastomers.
    Talley SJ; Branch B; Welch CF; Park CH; Dattelbaum DM; Lee KS
    Data Brief; 2020 Oct; 32():106240. PubMed ID: 32984456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corrigendum to "Evaluation of Some Mechanical Properties of a Maxillofacial Silicon Elastomer Reinforced with Polyester Powder".
    Haider YM; Abdullah ZS; Fatalla AA; Jani GH; Mokhtar N
    Int J Dent; 2020; 2020():7187159. PubMed ID: 33057460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Maxillofacial Silicone Type A-2186 Impregnated with a Hybrid Chitosan-TiO
    Al-Kadi FK; Adbulkareem JF; Azhdar BA
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2023 Nov; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 37999180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancement of Tech-Sil25 Maxillofacial Silicone Mechanical Properties after Artificial Weathering through Addition of Nanoparticles.
    Fadhil Bunyan S; Mohamad Suhaimi F; Mohidden Mostafa Zardawi F; Mohd Noor SNF; Zabidi MA
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():4082168. PubMed ID: 36624857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of tensile strength, tear strength, color stability and hardness of conventional and 1% trisnorbornenylisobutyl polyhedralsilsesquioxane modified room temperature vulcanizing maxillofacial silicone after a six month artificial aging period.
    Gandhi DS; Sethuraman R
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):328-337. PubMed ID: 36511066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of a mixture of nanofiller and intrinsic pigment on tear strength and hardness of two types of maxillofacial silicone elastomers.
    Abdul-Ameer FM
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2020; 17(4):251-257. PubMed ID: 33282150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of nano-titanium oxide addition on some mechanical properties of silicone elastomers for maxillofacial prostheses.
    Shakir DA; Abdul-Ameer FM
    J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 13(3):281-290. PubMed ID: 31435335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillofacial prosthetic materials- an inclination towards silicones.
    Mitra A; Choudhary S; Garg H; H G J
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Dec; 8(12):ZE08-13. PubMed ID: 25654054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomers reinforced with silica powder.
    Andreopoulos AG; Evangelatou M; Tarantili PA
    J Biomater Appl; 1998 Jul; 13(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9689580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of pigments on dynamic mechanical properties of a maxillofacial prosthetic elastomer.
    Hu X; Pan X; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1298-303. PubMed ID: 24836534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical Properties and Simulated Aging of Silicone Maxillofacial Elastomers: Advancements in the Past 45 Years.
    Hatamleh MM; Polyzois GL; Nuseir A; Hatamleh K; Alnazzawi A
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Jul; 25(5):418-26. PubMed ID: 26805510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical behavior of three maxillofacial prosthetic adhesive systems: a pilot project.
    Wolfaardt JF; Tam V; Faulkner MG; Prasad N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):943-9. PubMed ID: 1494125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of various reinforcements for maxillofacial silicone elastomers.
    Andreopoulos AG; Evangelatou M
    J Biomater Appl; 1994 Apr; 8(4):344-60. PubMed ID: 8064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the physical properties of two types of polydimethyl siloxane for fabrication of facial prostheses.
    Sanchez RA; Moore DJ; Cruz DL; Chappell R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):679-82. PubMed ID: 1527755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.