147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8064955)
1. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates.
Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8064955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis.
Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():194-6. PubMed ID: 7668633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
Hodges AV; Villasuso E; Balkany T; Bird PA; Butts S; Lee D; Gomez O
Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
Boyd PJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Prognostic indications within the scope of the selection of cochlear implant patients].
Burian K; Klasek O
Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Apr; 68(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 2742645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative psychophysical evaluation in cochlear implantation: electrical and magnetic stimulation.
Chen J; Hanusaik L; Ramses P; Schipp D; Anderson J; McLean A; Nedzelski J
Am J Otol; 1997 Jan; 18(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8989950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of older adult cochlear implant users in Hong Kong.
Chan V; Tong M; Yue V; Wong T; Leung E; Yuen K; van Hasselt A
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 17496647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blink reflex and auditory speech perception in prelingually cochlear-implanted children.
Emamdjomeh H; Shafaghat L; Abbassalipour P; Hassanzadeh S; Alaeddini F; Farhadi M; Daneshi A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15823805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results and perspectives with extracochlear round window electrodes.
Dillier N; Spillmann T
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():221-9. PubMed ID: 6596846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the nucleus-24 and freedom cochlear implants.
Büchner A; Nogueira W; Edler B; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 18223445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
