111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8065627)
1. Norplant: nursing's responsibility in procreative rights.
Moseley CA; Beard MT
Nurs Health Care; 1994 Jun; 15(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 8065627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The social meaning of the Norplant condition: constitutional considerations of race, class, and gender.
Albiston C
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1994; 9():9-57. PubMed ID: 16767841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive health and blurred professional boundaries.
Chavkin W; Breitbart V
Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 8932462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Norplant.
McIntyre PS
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1992 Jul; 85(7):333-4. PubMed ID: 1625459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.
Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH
J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy.
Stephenson PA; Wagner MG
J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International human rights and women's reproductive health.
Cook RJ
Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8511808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implanted protection. Women slowly turn to Norplant use.
Kobren G
Sun; 1991 Jul; ():1C, 5C. PubMed ID: 12290563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Public funding and policies for provision of the contraceptive implant, fiscal year 1992.
Kaeser L
Fam Plann Perspect; 1994; 26(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 8174690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinics: Norplant cost chokes services.
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(5):1, 28. PubMed ID: 12319135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IMAP statement on Norplant subdermal contraceptive implant system.
International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
IPPF Med Bull; 1993 Apr; 27(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12345306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overview of Norplant litigation.
Henry PF
Nurse Pract Forum; 1995 Jun; 6(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 7620394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Depot levonorgestrel (Norplant) use in teenagers.
Miller M
West J Med; 1993 Feb; 158(2):183. PubMed ID: 8434476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The introduction of a new contraceptive; two years experience with Norplant.
Davie J; Hiremath K; Glasier A
Health Bull (Edinb); 1996 Jul; 54(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 8783485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Norplant: the new scarlet letter?
Flannery MT
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Set clear guidelines for Norplant removals.
Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Mar; 20(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 12321964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An assessment of Norplant removal in Indonesia.
Fisher AA; Prihartono J; Tuladhar J; Hoesni RH
Stud Fam Plann; 1997 Dec; 28(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 9431651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
Antarsh L
AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinicians, patients, Medicaid: is anyone to blame for Norplant removal dilemma? Part II.
Contracept Technol Update; 1993 Oct; 14(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12286902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
