These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8065737)

  • 1. Detection of experimentally induced lesions in subtraction images of cancellous alveolar bone.
    Katsarsky JW; Levine MS; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jun; 77(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 8065737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
    Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of small lesions in alveolar bone by digital subtraction radiography.
    Ying SY; Chen X; Zhang G; Cao CF
    Chin J Dent Res; 1999 May; 2(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 10863402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of small angle discrepancies on interpretations of subtraction images.
    Davis M; Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Sep; 78(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 7970605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
    Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of variations in projection geometry and lesion size on detection of computer-simulated crestal alveolar bone lesions by subtraction radiography.
    Hausmann E; Allen KM; Piedmonte MR
    J Periodontal Res; 1991 Jan; 26(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 1825334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative analysis of periodontal defects in a skull model by subtraction radiography using a digital imaging device.
    Young SJ; Chaibi MS; Graves DT; Majzoub Z; Boustany F; Cochran D; Nummikoski P
    J Periodontol; 1996 Aug; 67(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 8866315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosis of bone lesions by subtraction radiography.
    Rethman M; Ruttiman U; O'Neal R; Webber R; Davis A; Greenstein G; Woodyard S
    J Periodontol; 1985 Jun; 56(6):324-9. PubMed ID: 3891960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of zoomed digital image in the detection of periodontal bone defect: in vitro study.
    de Morais JA; Sakakura CE; Loffredo LC; Scaf G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16618844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of peri-implant bone change.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; van den Berg HR; Bertens E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Mar; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1420723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions.
    Furkart AJ; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Nummikoski P; Matteson S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Nov; 74(5):652-60. PubMed ID: 1437069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observer variation in the radiographic assessment of the bone level on the buccal and lingual surfaces of mandibular molars.
    Gürgan C; Gröndahl K; Wennström
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 8617389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy.
    Reddy MS
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12 Suppl):1078-84. PubMed ID: 1479529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.