300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8066836)
1. [Episiotomy and perineal lesions in spontaneous vaginal delivery].
Henriksen TB; Bek KM; Hedegaard M; Secher NJ
Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 May; 156(21):3176-9. PubMed ID: 8066836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Episiotomy and perineal lesions in spontaneous vaginal deliveries.
Henriksen TB; Bek KM; Hedegaard M; Secher NJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Dec; 99(12):950-4. PubMed ID: 1477014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomy.
Henriksen TB; Bek KM; Hedegaard M; Secher NJ
BMJ; 1994 Nov; 309(6964):1255-8. PubMed ID: 7888844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.
de Leeuw JW; de Wit C; Kuijken JP; Bruinse HW
BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.
Hudelist G; Gelle'n J; Singer C; Ruecklinger E; Czerwenka K; Kandolf O; Keckstein J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 15746685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.
Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Goyder K; Howarth L; Strachan B
BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. PubMed ID: 19035944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture.
Räisänen SH; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K; Gissler M; Heinonen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(12):1365-72. PubMed ID: 19852569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.
Fenner DE; Genberg B; Brahma P; Marek L; DeLancey JO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50. PubMed ID: 14710059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum.
Kudish B; Blackwell S; Mcneeley SG; Bujold E; Kruger M; Hendrix SL; Sokol R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Is primiparity, the only risk factor for type 3 and 4 perineal injury, during delivery?].
Barbier A; Poujade O; Fay R; Thiébaugeorges O; Levardon M; Deval B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Feb; 35(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 17291807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?
Revicky V; Nirmal D; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris EP; Nieto JJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jun; 150(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20359810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal birth.
Okeahialam NA; Sultan AH; Thakar R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S991-S1004. PubMed ID: 37635056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High episiotomy rate protects from obstetric anal sphincter ruptures: a birth register-study on delivery intervention policies in Finland.
Räisänen S; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K; Gissler M; Heinonen S
Scand J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 39(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 21444353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antenatal use of a novel vaginal birth training device by term primiparous women in Singapore.
Kok J; Tan KH; Koh S; Cheng PS; Lim WY; Yew ML; Yeo GS
Singapore Med J; 2004 Jul; 45(7):318-23. PubMed ID: 15221047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears.
Aukee P; Sundström H; Kairaluoma MV
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):856-60. PubMed ID: 16817086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalisable? A prospective observational study.
Lai CY; Cheung HW; Hsi Lao TT; Lau TK; Leung TY
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Dec; 22(12):1116-21. PubMed ID: 19916709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.
Andrews V; Sultan AH; Thakar R; Jones PW
Birth; 2006 Jun; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 16732776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anal sphincter tears at spontaneous delivery: a comparison of five hospitals in Norway.
Valbø A; Gjessing L; Herzog C; Goderstad JM; Laine K; Valset AM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1176-80. PubMed ID: 18972270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
