183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8068848)
1. Simple capture-recapture models permitting unequal catchability and variable sampling effort.
Agresti A
Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):494-500. PubMed ID: 8068848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of mixed logit models to reflect heterogeneity in capture-recapture studies.
Coull BA; Agresti A
Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):294-301. PubMed ID: 11318172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating population size for capture-recapture data when capture probabilities vary by time and individual animal.
Chao A; Lee SM; Jeng SL
Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):201-16. PubMed ID: 1581485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
Borchers DL; Efford MG
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability.
Chao A
Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):783-91. PubMed ID: 3427163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A likelihood-based approach to capture-recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design.
Kendall WL; Pollock KH; Brownie C
Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):293-308. PubMed ID: 7766783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new change-in-ratio procedure robust to unequal catchability of types of animal.
Pollock KH; Lancia RA; Conner MC; Wood BL
Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):653-62. PubMed ID: 4074817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: II. Jolly-Seber model.
Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL
Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 19930186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A general theory for modeling capture-recapture data from a closed population.
Evans MA; Bonett DG; McDonald LL
Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):396-405. PubMed ID: 8068840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A class of latent Markov models for capture-recapture data allowing for time, heterogeneity, and behavior effects.
Bartolucci F; Pennoni F
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):568-78. PubMed ID: 17688509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A bayesian approach to the multistate Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model.
Dupuis JA; Schwarz CJ
Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1015-22. PubMed ID: 17501941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The minimum capture proportion for reliable estimation in capture-recapture models.
Xi L; Watson R; Yip PS
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):242-9. PubMed ID: 17680836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of accounting for detection heterogeneity when estimating abundance: the case of French wolves.
Cubaynes S; Pradel R; Choquet R; Duchamp C; Gaillard JM; Lebreton JD; Marboutin E; Miquel C; Reboulet AM; Poillot C; Taberlet P; Gimenez O
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):621-6. PubMed ID: 20105205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A unified likelihood-based approach for estimating population size in continuous-time capture-recapture experiments with frailty.
Xi L; Yip PS; Watson R
Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):228-36. PubMed ID: 17447949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The performance of mixture models in heterogeneous closed population capture-recapture.
Pledger S
Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):868-73; discussion 874-6. PubMed ID: 16135042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A continuous time version and a generalization of a Markov-recapture model for trapping experiments.
Alpizar-Jara R; Smith CE
Math Biosci; 2008; 214(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 18556026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semiparametric estimation of animal abundance using capture-recapture data from open populations.
Huggins R
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):684-90. PubMed ID: 16984308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semiparametric regression in capture-recapture modeling.
Gimenez O; Crainiceanu C; Barbraud C; Jenouvrier S; Morgan BJ
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):691-8. PubMed ID: 16984309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Bayesian, combinatorial approach to capture-recapture.
García-Pelayo R
Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 16904143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accommodating unmodeled heterogeneity in double-observer distance sampling surveys.
Borchers DL; Laake JL; Southwell C; Paxton CG
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):372-8. PubMed ID: 16918901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
