These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8068849)

  • 1. An improved removal method for estimating animal abundance.
    Hirst D
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):501-5. PubMed ID: 8068849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
    Borchers DL; Efford MG
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Site occupancy models with heterogeneous detection probabilities.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 16542234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Under-smoothed kernel confidence intervals for the hazard ratio based on censored data.
    Tu D
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 17623350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the species accumulation curve using mixtures.
    Mao CX; Colwell RK; Chang J
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):433-41. PubMed ID: 16011689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A likelihood approach to estimating animal density from binary acoustic transects.
    Horrocks J; Hamilton DC; Whitehead H
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):681-90. PubMed ID: 21039393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving removal-based estimates of abundance by sampling a population of spatially distinct subpopulations.
    Dorazio RM; Jelks HL; Jordan F
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1093-101. PubMed ID: 16401283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 15032780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple capture-recapture models permitting unequal catchability and variable sampling effort.
    Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):494-500. PubMed ID: 8068848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parameters of a dose-response model are on the boundary: what happens with BMDL?
    Kopylev L; Fox J
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jan; 29(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18808395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of fish abundance indices based on scientific research trawl surveys.
    Chen J; Thompson ME; Wu C
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 15032781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating population size for a continuous time frailty model with covariates in a capture-recapture study.
    Xu Y; Liu L; You N; Pan H; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):917-21. PubMed ID: 17403102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new change-in-ratio procedure robust to unequal catchability of types of animal.
    Pollock KH; Lancia RA; Conner MC; Wood BL
    Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):653-62. PubMed ID: 4074817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detectability in conventional and adaptive sampling.
    Thompson SK; Seber GA
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):712-24. PubMed ID: 7981397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A unified likelihood-based approach for estimating population size in continuous-time capture-recapture experiments with frailty.
    Xi L; Yip PS; Watson R
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):228-36. PubMed ID: 17447949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting statistical evidence with empirical likelihood functions.
    Zhang Z
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):710-20. PubMed ID: 19650056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplified point and interval estimation for removal trapping.
    Soms AP
    Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 4074818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a log-normal mean.
    Wu J; Wong AC; Jiang G
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1849-60. PubMed ID: 12754720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An analysis of eight 95 per cent confidence intervals for a ratio of Poisson parameters when events are rare.
    Barker L; Cadwell BL
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(20):4030-7. PubMed ID: 18288790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bootstrap confidence intervals for relative risk parameters in affected-sib-pair data.
    Cordell HJ; Carpenter JR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):157-72. PubMed ID: 10642428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.